1999
DOI: 10.1007/s001980050222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age- and Gender-Specific Rate of Fractures in Australia: A Population-Based Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
155
5
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
16
155
5
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Many factors may contribute to the increased differences between sexes in fracture rates with ageing, including differences in bone strength [29,30], propensity to fall [26], and the load placed on the bone [31]. The gradient of fracture risk by age varies not only by sex, but also by skeletal site [28,32]. Of note, we used a composite outcome combining fractures occurring at different skeletal sites, and as such, we cannot comment on the relationships between age, sex and skeletal site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many factors may contribute to the increased differences between sexes in fracture rates with ageing, including differences in bone strength [29,30], propensity to fall [26], and the load placed on the bone [31]. The gradient of fracture risk by age varies not only by sex, but also by skeletal site [28,32]. Of note, we used a composite outcome combining fractures occurring at different skeletal sites, and as such, we cannot comment on the relationships between age, sex and skeletal site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) Such increases in the absolute number of hip fractures are sequelae of age-related hip fracture incidence and the increase in the population at risk associated with an aging population. (6,7) Hip fracture is the most common reason for hospitalization following fracture. (2,3) Based on hospital separations, hip fracture incidence appears to be declining in Western populations, (8)(9)(10)(11) including Australia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controls were matched to cases on sex, age (within 5 year age range) and postcode. Matching ensured that case and control groups had similar proportional distributions on age and sex, since it is known that hip fracture rates increase exponentially with age and are consistently higher in women than men in age groups over 65 years (Sanders et al 1999). Matching was also on postcode, used as a proxy indicator of socio-economic status (SES) (Australian Bureau of Statistics 2004), since SES is also associated with risk of hip fracture (Farahmand et al 2000).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%