2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and genetic strain differences in response to chronic methylphenidate administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are not in accord with the conclusion reached by Dafny and colleagues that “the SHR group is the least susceptible to development of behavioral sensitization” [10]. Rather, our results suggest that SHR rats are more vulnerable than other strains to methylphenidate-induced cross-sensitization to the locomotor-activating effects of cocaine when methylphenidate is administered in an environment other than home.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These results are not in accord with the conclusion reached by Dafny and colleagues that “the SHR group is the least susceptible to development of behavioral sensitization” [10]. Rather, our results suggest that SHR rats are more vulnerable than other strains to methylphenidate-induced cross-sensitization to the locomotor-activating effects of cocaine when methylphenidate is administered in an environment other than home.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we saw results pointing to the same direction, suggesting that previous methylphenidate exposure enhances further reinstatement of previously extinguished drug-seeking behavior, at least in Wistar rats. Meanwhile, Yang et al (2011) demonstrated that rats chronically administered with methylphenidate (2.5 or 10 mg/kg, IP for 6 days) showed strain-dependent ambulatory response to methylphenidate rechallenge (i.e. after 3 days of washout).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SHR exhibits good face, construct and predictive validity, displaying hyperactivity, impulsivity, novelty seeking and sustained attention deficits relative to the normotensive control strain, the WKY rats . In some studies, the SHR showed variable locomotor responses to methylphenidate and did not manifest behavioral (locomotor) sensitization or tolerance to repetitive treatment of the drug (Yang et al 2003(Yang et al , 2011. Meanwhile, the drug intake profile of the methylphenidatetreated SHR in the self-administration paradigm, considered as the most relevant animal model of drug addiction, has not yet been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Previous dose response experiments using MPD from 0.1 to 40 mg/kg found that 2.5 mg/kg MPD (i.p.) elicited behavioral and neurophysiological sensitization ( Gaytan et al, 1996;Lee et al, 2009; Podet et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2001; 2003b; 2006a; 2006c; 2007; 2010; 2011). Thus, the 2.5 mg/kg MPD dose was used in this experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%