2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and growth of the blacknose shark, Carcharhinus acronotus (Poey, 1860) off the northeastern Brazilian Coast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the shapes and AIC values can be very close or equal. Similar results have been previously described using the general model of Richards or Schnute vs. different growth submodels (Rogers-Bennett et al 2007, Flores et al 2010, Shelton et al 2006, Barreto et al 2011. The literature shows that for the multi-model inference approach applied to individual growth, it is not unusual that different candidate growth models yield equal values of AIC (Rogers-Bennett et al 2007, Flores et al 2010, Helidoniotis et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the shapes and AIC values can be very close or equal. Similar results have been previously described using the general model of Richards or Schnute vs. different growth submodels (Rogers-Bennett et al 2007, Flores et al 2010, Shelton et al 2006, Barreto et al 2011. The literature shows that for the multi-model inference approach applied to individual growth, it is not unusual that different candidate growth models yield equal values of AIC (Rogers-Bennett et al 2007, Flores et al 2010, Helidoniotis et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The literature shows that for the multi-model inference approach applied to individual growth, it is not unusual that different candidate growth models yield equal values of AIC (Rogers-Bennett et al 2007, Flores et al 2010, Helidoniotis et al 2011). Several studies also have shown that the AIC estimates of the candidate growth models were very close; the magnitude of the change can be < 0.1 (Araya & Cubillos 2006, Shelton et al 2006, Farrell et al 2010, Barreto et al 2011, Grist et al 2011, Mercier et al 2011, Shuman et al 2011. Markaida et al (2005), using mark-recapture data of D. gigas, showed that the daily growth rate diminishes for older individuals; their study analyzed squid between 46 and 80.7 cm ML, and the daily growth rate changed from 1.5 to 1.0 mm d −1…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, timely and regional reproductive information is rare for many elasmobranch species throughout the world. Even more rare are reproductive studies that also estimate the ages of elasmobranchs; most age-at-maturity estimates are back-calculated using the von Bertalanffy (von Bertalanffy 1938) equation for size at maturity (Casey et al 1985;Carlson et al 2006;Barreto et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in recent years using a multiple model approach have, however, established that alternative models may be more appropriate in some shark species Barreto et al, 2011;Geraghty et al, 2014). Therefore an information-theoretic, multi-model inference (MMI) approach was used (Burnham and Anderson, 2001;Harry et al, 2013) to determine the most appropriate growth model for G. cuvier in eastern Australian waters.…”
Section: Growth Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%