Age and Sex Differences in the Cooperative and Noncooperative Behavior of Pairs of American Children

Stingle, Sandra F.; Cook, Harold

doi:10.1080/00223980.1985.10542905

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This dilemma has two characteristics: (1) For each strategy maker, if they adopt uncooperative strategies, they may obtain more benefits than adopting cooperation strategies. (2) If all counterparties adopt a cooperative strategy, the individual gains more than all individuals adopt a noncooperative strategy; when everyone adopts a noncooperative strategy, the benefit of each decision maker is far less than When everyone cooperates with each other. The "decision dilemma" is a dilemma.…”

Section: B Effect Of Results Feedback On College Studentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rapoport (1995) discovered early on that in the face of real opponents, the frequency of cooperation of participants with feedback increases, and the frequency of cooperation of participants without feedback decreases [1]. Kelly and others found that partners will show competitive behavior when their partners first encounter competitors in real life, but when they meet partners again, they will show cooperation again [2]. A large number of studies have also found that communication and exchange can further influence cooperation, and foreign scholars also focus on the role of language exchange in research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Influence of Gender Matching and Result Feedback on University Students Cooperative Behavior

Pan¹,

Wang²

2018

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Judicial, Administrative and Humanitarian Problems of State Structures and E

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study focused on gender pairing and results feedback of the cooperative behavior of college students. Randomly selected 84 college students, Males and females equally divided, using 3 (male-male pairing, male-female pairing and female-female pairing) multiply by 2 (feedback, no feedback results) completely randomized design, the dependent variable indicators was cooperation behavior frequency. The results showed that: (1) the cooperative behavior of university students on gender pairing had a significant difference; the frequency of cooperative behavior was higher in the case of female. (2)The results feedback affect cooperative behavior frequency, results feedback of the average cooperative behavior frequency was higher than no results feedback. (3)The interaction of gender pairing factors and results feedback was not significant.

show abstract

Section: B Effect Of Results Feedback On College Studentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of Gender Matching and Result Feedback on University Students Cooperative Behavior

Pan¹,

Wang²

2018

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Judicial, Administrative and Humanitarian Problems of State Structures and E

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cooperation increases in frequency until ages 8-11 in American children and may actually diminish somewhat beyond that point, particularly in boys (Stingle & Cook 1985). Sex differences are not apparent among small children (Georgas 1985a(Georgas , 1985b but may emerge in older children (Stingle andCook 1985, Stockdale, et al 1983).…”

Section: ~Rmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Heuristics for Cooperative Problem Solving

Franklin¹,

Harmon²

1989

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OMBNo. 070-o088 la. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION lb. RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS Unclassified None 2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3 DISTRIBUTION /AVAILABILITY OF REPORT %2b. OECLASSIFICATION /DOWNGRADING SCKIEDULE Approved for Public Release Distribution is Unlimited 4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 5. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NIUMBER(S) 198900-2-F TR 13389 6&. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION

show abstract

“…We study strategic behavior in competitive games, rather than cooperative behavior. A few papers investigate how cooperation or coordination changes with age in strategic games (Kagan and Madsen, 1971;Stingle and Cook, 1985;Fan, 2000;Harbaugh and Krause, 2000;Sally and Hill, 2006;Devetag et al, 2013;Grueneisen et al, 2015;, while a couple of papers investigate the role of theory-of-mind with a focus on autistic children (Sally and Hill, 2006;Li et al, 2014). 7 We now turn to intentions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…7 Using bespoke games, Kagan and Madsen, 1971, find cooperation decreases with age, while Stingle and Cook, 1985, find the opposite. In a repeated prisoners ' dilemma, Fan (2000) finds that cooperation increases with age, while Sally and Hill (2006) find no age effect.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive Skills and the Development of Strategic Sophistication

Gill²

2018

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world's largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.

show abstract

Age and Sex Differences in the Cooperative and Noncooperative Behavior of Pairs of American Children

Cited by 5 publications

References 22 publications

The Influence of Gender Matching and Result Feedback on University Students Cooperative Behavior

The Influence of Gender Matching and Result Feedback on University Students Cooperative Behavior

Heuristics for Cooperative Problem Solving

Cognitive Skills and the Development of Strategic Sophistication

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About