2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2021.125845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and size outperform topographic effects on growth-climate responses of trees in two Central European coniferous forest types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach is the analysis of tree rings in regards to past climate change. Several such studies reveal that trees of different age and size vary in their growth response to past climatic variation (see Au et al., 2022 ; Carrer & Urbinati, 2004 ; Depardieu et al., 2020 ; Housset et al., 2018 ; Latreille et al., 2017 ; Marquis et al., 2020 ; Mašek et al., 2021 ; Pompa‐Garcıa & Hadad, 2016 ). Unless the entire historical population can be sampled (including dead trees), studying only those individuals who survived past climatic fluctuations may, however, lead to an overestimation of tolerance in older age classes due to survivor bias (Duchesne et al., 2019 , similar to the slow‐grower survivorship bias reported in Brienen et al., 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another approach is the analysis of tree rings in regards to past climate change. Several such studies reveal that trees of different age and size vary in their growth response to past climatic variation (see Au et al., 2022 ; Carrer & Urbinati, 2004 ; Depardieu et al., 2020 ; Housset et al., 2018 ; Latreille et al., 2017 ; Marquis et al., 2020 ; Mašek et al., 2021 ; Pompa‐Garcıa & Hadad, 2016 ). Unless the entire historical population can be sampled (including dead trees), studying only those individuals who survived past climatic fluctuations may, however, lead to an overestimation of tolerance in older age classes due to survivor bias (Duchesne et al., 2019 , similar to the slow‐grower survivorship bias reported in Brienen et al., 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While younger life stages are generally thought to be less tolerant to climatic stress than larger trees (e.g., Black & Bliss, 1980 ; Kueppers et al., 2017 ; Munier et al., 2010 ; Pompa‐Garcıa & Hadad, 2016 , though see Du et al., 2019 for an exception), several considerations may make our predictions about the best provenance more complex. First, younger and older stages may be sensitive to different climatic factors, rather than overall less or more tolerant to any stress (Mašek et al., 2021 ). Competition within and between species is a strong determinant of survival, especially in younger trees (Kunstler et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was assumed here that the relationship between growth and climate did not vary with age once the low-frequency signal had been removed with standardisation. However, several authors have shown that age can have an in uence on the sensitivity of growth to climate, and that this can vary depending on the species (Carrer and Urbinati 2004; Konter et al 2016;Mašek et al 2021). The age effect could therefore be another explanation for the observed change in the growth-climate relationships.…”
Section: Climate-growth Relationships Stability Through Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then conducted a multiple regression analysis with the selected climate indicators to identify the climate factors that lead to tree ring variability. In addition, we used the selected climate indicators and the principal component chronology for correlation analysis to find the driving factors of the first two principal components [34]. We took the square of the correlation coefficient between RWIs and selected climate variables (r 2 ) because the r 2 in univariate linear regression refers to the variance explained by a regressor [26,35], enabling us to estimate the potential impact of corresponding climate variables on tree growth trends.…”
Section: Radial Growth-climate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%