2018
DOI: 10.1127/nos/2018/0416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and synchronicity of planktonic foraminiferal bioevents across the Cenomanian – Turonian boundary interval (Late Cretaceous)

Abstract: The upper Cenomanian-lower Turonian is a key-stratigraphic interval, as it encompasses the Late Cretaceous supergreenhouse and a major perturbation of the global carbon cycle (i. e., Oceanic Anoxic Event 2) as evidenced by a global positive carbon isotope excursion and by the nearly worldwide deposition of organic-rich marine facies. A turnover in planktonic foraminiferal assemblages and in other marine organisms is documented across this stratigraphic interval, but reconstruction of the timing and identificat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(259 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five levels were described in the Pyun section which coincide with bioevents. The mentioned levels are certainly controlled by ecological factors (Falzoni, Petrizzo, Caron, Leckie, & Elderbak, 2018). The evolutionary trend initiates with praealveolinids and ovalveolinids and proceeds in the middle of the Late Cenomanian.…”
Section: Proposed Evolutionary Trends Of Alveolinids In the Study Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five levels were described in the Pyun section which coincide with bioevents. The mentioned levels are certainly controlled by ecological factors (Falzoni, Petrizzo, Caron, Leckie, & Elderbak, 2018). The evolutionary trend initiates with praealveolinids and ovalveolinids and proceeds in the middle of the Late Cenomanian.…”
Section: Proposed Evolutionary Trends Of Alveolinids In the Study Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years however, taxonomic revisions of planktonic foraminiferal taxa, especially of the polyphyletic Rotalipora group (Rotalipora, Brotzen 1942;Thalmanninella, Sigal, 1948;Pseudothamanninella, Wonders, 1978;Parathalmanninella, Lipson-Benitah, 2008), have resulted in the re-interpretation of the morphologic plasticity and species variation within the lineages (Robaszynski et al, 1994;Petrizzo and Huber, 2006;Gonzales-Donoso et al, 2007;Lipson-Benitah, 2008), which of course, has influences on the classic planktonic foraminiferal biozonations (e.g. discussions in Ando et al, 2010;Falzoni et al, 2018). In contrast to the Tethys, unkeeled and globular forms, predominately muricohedbergellids (Huber and Leckie, 2011) dominate the lower to lowermost Upper Cretaceous of the Boreal epicontinental basins (Hecht, 1938;Carter and Hart, 1977;Weiss, 1997;Rückheim et al, 2006;Weiss, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extinction of Marginotruncana in the Santonian might be explained by the stress of cooling combined with likely competition exerted by species of the diversifying Globotruncana lineage which occupied similar depth habitats as species of Marginotruncana , a possibility previously postulated by Falzoni et al. (2018).…”
Section: Paleoceanography and Onset Of The Long‐term Cooling In The Santonianmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In terms of composition of the planktonic foraminiferal assemblages, the interval of relatively rapid cooling (Figure 12) includes (a) the extinctions of P. papula at 77.60 m CCSF and all species of the genus Marginotruncana (79.75 m CCSF), (b) the appearance of A. cretacea (75.29 m CCSF), and (c) an increase in abundance of G. bulloides. The extinction of Marginotruncana in the Santonian might be explained by the stress of cooling combined with likely competition exerted by species of the diversifying Globotruncana lineage which occupied similar depth habitats as species of Marginotruncana, a possibility previously postulated by Falzoni et al (2018).…”
Section: Planktonic Foraminiferal Patternsmentioning
confidence: 88%