2022
DOI: 10.1177/07435584221115351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age, Autonomy, and Authority of Knowledge: Discursive Constructions of Youth Decision-Making Capacity and Parental Support in Transgender Minors’ Accounts of Healthcare Access

Abstract: While access to care is known to improve health outcomes for transgender youth, these youth often face challenges in accessing care related to decision-making capacity and the legal limitations regarding age of consent. In this study, we utilize discourse analytic methods to identify how notions of age, autonomy, and authority of knowledge influence transgender youths’ ability to make agentic decisions about their bodies and health, and better understand the power dynamics present in youths’ relations with par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For youth, guidelines recognize differences in legal age of consent and emphasize informed consent as a process and practice of shared decision making, "Ideally, treatment decisions should be made among the adolescent, the family, and the treatment team" ( 13), but do not provide guidance about standardizing or documenting youth participation or parental involvement. Studies examining the decision making process for TNB youth seeking gender affirming care note variability in power dynamics, parental support, and factors supporting informed decision making (40)(41)(42)(43)(44). Details about provider informed consent practices in various settings is still limited (43,45), with only one study assessing TNB youth's decision-making ability that notes specifics about the informed consent process in two Dutch gender-identity clinics indicating that the process is standardized, occurs over several sessions (mean of 8.8 months) and concludes with parents and youth signing an informed consent document (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For youth, guidelines recognize differences in legal age of consent and emphasize informed consent as a process and practice of shared decision making, "Ideally, treatment decisions should be made among the adolescent, the family, and the treatment team" ( 13), but do not provide guidance about standardizing or documenting youth participation or parental involvement. Studies examining the decision making process for TNB youth seeking gender affirming care note variability in power dynamics, parental support, and factors supporting informed decision making (40)(41)(42)(43)(44). Details about provider informed consent practices in various settings is still limited (43,45), with only one study assessing TNB youth's decision-making ability that notes specifics about the informed consent process in two Dutch gender-identity clinics indicating that the process is standardized, occurs over several sessions (mean of 8.8 months) and concludes with parents and youth signing an informed consent document (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most adolescents are unable to make decisions about their healthcare without parental consent, their competence to understand and decide is considered by healthcare professionals, usually making decisions triadic. 17,58 Autonomy is often defined as the right to act using one’s judgement regarding matters that affect one’s own life without interference or coercion 16 It is counterintuitive that during considerations of care, TGD youth are required to demonstrate their capacity by being entirely certain of themselves in terms of their gender, but conversely are hindered by the dominant perceptions that adolescents are too young to make autonomous decisions regarding care. 17 However, when they attempt to assert their autonomy, Littman 5 and Marchiano 6 feel they are being influenced by others, which to these authors is evidenced by the significant increase in their interaction with social media before announcing that they were gender non-conforming.…”
Section: Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,58 Autonomy is often defined as the right to act using one’s judgement regarding matters that affect one’s own life without interference or coercion 16 It is counterintuitive that during considerations of care, TGD youth are required to demonstrate their capacity by being entirely certain of themselves in terms of their gender, but conversely are hindered by the dominant perceptions that adolescents are too young to make autonomous decisions regarding care. 17 However, when they attempt to assert their autonomy, Littman 5 and Marchiano 6 feel they are being influenced by others, which to these authors is evidenced by the significant increase in their interaction with social media before announcing that they were gender non-conforming. They also believe this theory is supported by TGD youth seeking advice from the internet including how to make money for medications, how to hide treatment from parents that they may have accessed and discussions they could have with doctors to convince them to provide care.…”
Section: Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation