1982
DOI: 10.1016/0012-821x(82)90132-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age dependence of continental heat flow—fantasy and facts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data re-emphasize the observation made from previous studies that the greenstone-granite-gneiss terrain of the Dharwar Craton is characterized by low heat flow in the range 25-50 mW m -2 and the variations within the craton are attributable to variations in heat production in the upper crust (Rao et al 1976(Rao et al , 1982Gupta et al 1991;Roy andRao 2000, 2003;Rao et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The data re-emphasize the observation made from previous studies that the greenstone-granite-gneiss terrain of the Dharwar Craton is characterized by low heat flow in the range 25-50 mW m -2 and the variations within the craton are attributable to variations in heat production in the upper crust (Rao et al 1976(Rao et al , 1982Gupta et al 1991;Roy andRao 2000, 2003;Rao et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The data from late Paleozoic, early Paleozoic, late Proterozoic, and early Proterozoic sites indicate similar distributions of heat flow values within these provinces, but for Archean sites the average heat flow is lower, and the apparent scatter of the data is about half that of Proterozoic and Paleozoic sites. These basic features of the global continental heat flow data set are also apparent in a more detailed analysis of the data by Rao et al [1982]. With reference to the present study, the data indicate that heat flow is, on average, lower and more consistent at Archean sites than at younger sites.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Continental heat flow data compiled by Chapman and Furlong [1977] as a function of "tectonothermal" age (the age of the last major tectonic and/ or magmatic event in an area) are shown in Figure 1. The use of normal distribution statistics in this plot may not have any true statistical meaning since examination of the data sets in each group indicates that they are multimodal [Rao et al, 1982;, but the apparent standard deviations of the means do give some indication of the relative scatters of the data sets in each age group. Data from Cenozoic and Mesozoic sites indicate that, on average, heat flow is higher at these sites than at older sites and that the data are more scattered than from older sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main feature of this study is the delineation of a high‐velocity (7.5 km/s) and high‐density (3.05 g/cm 3 ) layer above the Moho, which is attributed to the emplacement of mafic underplating material at the base of the crust via mantle diapirism in this pull‐apart rift basin. The underplating is supported by anomalous high heat flux (77 mW/m 2 ) in the region as compared to that (average 30 mW/m 2 ) of the stable shield and other cratonic regions of India [ Rao et al , 1982]. The reduced crustal thickness (35–37 km) compared to the average Moho depth (∼42 km) of adjacent areas of the shield, Godavari graben, and east of Narmada lineament in central India [ Kaila and Sain , 1997] also bolster the crustal underplating in the Mahanadi delta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A careful study indicates that the heat flux values in the Indian Gondwana basins surrounding the Mahanadi basin range from 49 to 107 mW/m 2 with a mean value of 77 mW/m 2 [ Rao and Rao , 1980, 1983]. This is very high compared to that (average of 30 mW/m 2 ) of the stable shield and other cratonic regions of India [ Rao et al , 1982]. Magmatic underplating has been invoked in recent years as a mechanism of crustal growth in which new material is added to the base of existing crust during the periods of high heat flow and crustal extension [ Furlong and Fountain , 1986; White and McKenzie , 1989].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%