2019
DOI: 10.3390/ani9110995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-Dependent Utilization of Shelters and Habitat in Two Reptile Species with Contrasting Intraspecific Interactions

Abstract: Simple SummaryIntraspecific interactions are known to affect habitat use in birds and mammals but their role in spatial ecology of reptiles is far less recognized. Our comparative study shows that species known to exhibit intraspecific predation (smooth snake Coronella austriaca) express clearly different patterns of habitat and shelter occupancy than a species with no such cannibalistic behavior (slow worm Anguis fragilis). Specifically, juvenile smooth snakes prefer sites and shelters not occupied by the adu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these three patterns should be discussed in the light of the theory and the empirical data available for the ontogenetic habitat changes of lizards (e.g., [25][26][27]). Indeed, there is a wealth of studies highlighting that ontogenetic habitat shifts are not unusual in lizards, as they have been observed for instance in Teiidae [25], Scincidae [28], Anolidae [29], Lacertidae [30], Chamaeleonidae [31], Varanidae [32], and Anguidae [33], among others. However, previous data were relatively contrasting even on the same groups of lizards: for instance, in Anolis lizards, some studies documented a clear ontogenetic shift in habitat use (e.g., [29]), whereas other studies did not find any ontogenetic effect on the structural niche use [34].…”
Section: Ecological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these three patterns should be discussed in the light of the theory and the empirical data available for the ontogenetic habitat changes of lizards (e.g., [25][26][27]). Indeed, there is a wealth of studies highlighting that ontogenetic habitat shifts are not unusual in lizards, as they have been observed for instance in Teiidae [25], Scincidae [28], Anolidae [29], Lacertidae [30], Chamaeleonidae [31], Varanidae [32], and Anguidae [33], among others. However, previous data were relatively contrasting even on the same groups of lizards: for instance, in Anolis lizards, some studies documented a clear ontogenetic shift in habitat use (e.g., [29]), whereas other studies did not find any ontogenetic effect on the structural niche use [34].…”
Section: Ecological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in turn could provide an additional explanation of why ophiophagy, including cannibalism, is relatively rarely reported in snakes (Jackson et al, 2004) and why slow worms seem not to avoid shelters already inhabited by potential predators, i.e. smooth snakes (Kolanek et al, 2019) or Vipera berus (R.J. Hodges, personal communication).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation action and investigations benefit from baseline knowledge of how species use their habitats. For example, juvenile Smooth Snakes ( Coronella austriaca ) used habitat not inhabited by cannibalistic adults, requiring conservation of buffer zones to facilitate juvenile survival (Kolanek et al, 2019), and the rediscovered Barbados Leaf-Toed Gecko ( Phyllodactylus pulcher ) was more successful than introduced House Geckos ( Hemidactylus mabouia ) in exposed rocky habitat, emphasizing the need to conserve natural cliffs (Williams et al, 2020). In a protected national park, the identification of seasonal habitat use by Latifi's Viper ( Montivipera latifii ) informed the park's management procedures (Behrooz et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%