2000
DOI: 10.1076/anec.7.4.245.795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age Differences in Performance on Two Versions of the Brown-Peterson Task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, unlike younger adults, older adults exhibited a sizable testing effect on both the control items ($ 9%) and the consistent items ($ 10%), though neither comparison showed a statistically significant testing effect, possibly because of power issues (observed powers < .35), both ps > .10, but both p rep s > .79. One possible reason that older adults demonstrated a greater (though nonsignificant) testing effect than younger adults is that older adults might forget information at a faster rate (Floden, Stuss, & Craik, 2000), and the testing effect is typically more robust after forgetting has set in. (See Table 1 for probabilities of ''other' ' and ''no answer'' responses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, unlike younger adults, older adults exhibited a sizable testing effect on both the control items ($ 9%) and the consistent items ($ 10%), though neither comparison showed a statistically significant testing effect, possibly because of power issues (observed powers < .35), both ps > .10, but both p rep s > .79. One possible reason that older adults demonstrated a greater (though nonsignificant) testing effect than younger adults is that older adults might forget information at a faster rate (Floden, Stuss, & Craik, 2000), and the testing effect is typically more robust after forgetting has set in. (See Table 1 for probabilities of ''other' ' and ''no answer'' responses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O Teste Brown-Peterson é utilizado para avaliar a memória operacional e a capacidade de processamento de informação por meio da retenção de poucos itens num curto período de tempo (Folden, Stuss, & Craik, 2000;Spreen & Strauss, 1998). Estudos recentes de neuroimagem têm evidenciado que regiões do córtex pré-frontal são responsáveis pela manipulação e manutenção da informação por um curto período de tempo, e que estas regiões estão envolvidas nos processos de codificação e recuperação da memória episódica (Daselaar, Veltman, Rombouts, Raaijmakers, & Jonker, 2003;Nyberg et al, 2003;Ranganath, Johnson, & D´Esposito, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…In this paradigm, the term "serial position" refers to the presented word pairs such that the first serial position refers to the first word pair and so forth. It was assumed that the last two pairs of a list depended on working memory for recall, whereas the more temporally remote first three word pairs depended on a longer-term episodic memory system for successful encoding and retrieval (Madigan & McCabe 1971;Craik & Lockhart 1972;Floden et al 2000). *…”
Section: Memory In Noisy Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract the signal, listeners first have to segregate the noise from the target (stream segregation; Bregman 1990), a process that has been shown to require attention when complex sounds are involved (Snyder & Alain 2005;Alain & McDonald 2007). Transferring information from working memory to a more stable and long-lasting (Craik & Lockhart 1972;Craik 1983;Floden et al 2000) episodic memory also requires attentional resources (Craik 2002). If resources are limited, either because of older age or because part of the same resources are involved in segregating the target words from babble background, recall from the first three serial positions can be expected to suffer first.…”
Section: Memory In Noisy Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%