2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age estimation approaches using cranial suture closure: A validation study on a Thai population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been described as age mimicry, a phenomenon in which the age distribution of the target population mirrors the distribution of the reference population (Bocquet‐Appel & Masset, , Boldsen et al, :75, Buckberry, ). Age mimicry limits the applicability of age estimation methods on samples different in age composition from the reference population (e.g., Herrera & Retamal, ; Michopoulou, Negre, Nikita, & Kranioti, ; Ruengdit, Prasitwattanaseree, Mekjaidee, Sinthubua, & Mahakkanukrauh, ; Savall et al, ; Schmitt, ; Xanthopoulou et al, ), although some studies have shown that age mimicry does not always have a significant impact of the age distribution of skeletal samples (e.g., Moraitis, Zorba, Eliopoulous, & Fox, ; Sakaue, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been described as age mimicry, a phenomenon in which the age distribution of the target population mirrors the distribution of the reference population (Bocquet‐Appel & Masset, , Boldsen et al, :75, Buckberry, ). Age mimicry limits the applicability of age estimation methods on samples different in age composition from the reference population (e.g., Herrera & Retamal, ; Michopoulou, Negre, Nikita, & Kranioti, ; Ruengdit, Prasitwattanaseree, Mekjaidee, Sinthubua, & Mahakkanukrauh, ; Savall et al, ; Schmitt, ; Xanthopoulou et al, ), although some studies have shown that age mimicry does not always have a significant impact of the age distribution of skeletal samples (e.g., Moraitis, Zorba, Eliopoulous, & Fox, ; Sakaue, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other bone which is widely acknowledged as being a useful tool for age estimation is the skull. However, a study of suture closures in a Thai population by Ruengdit et al (2018), using the methods of Meindl and Lovejoy (1985), Acsádi andNemeskéri (1970), andMann (1991), revealed poor effectiveness as regards age estimation with endocranial suture. Only obliteration of the median palatine suture, using the Mann method (1991), could be used for prediction of the age of individuals over-50-years of age (Ruengdit et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 4 items, age estimation is the most complicated (Introna and Campobasso, 2006;Cattaneo et al, 2008;Vodanović et al, 2011;Priya, 2017). Bones, including pelvis, skulls, clavicles, and vertebrae, have been proved to be useful for age estimation (Mulhern and Jones, 2005;Watanabe and Terazawa, 2006;Albert, et al, 2010;Martins, et al, 2012;Pattamapaspong, et al, 2015;Ruengdit, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In past studies of cranial sutures, the inaccuracy of age estimation was 21.2 years in male Thai samples using the Meindl and Lovejoy () method and 13.3 years using the Acsádi and Nemeskéri () method (Ruengdit, Prasitwattanaseree, Mekjaidee, Sinthubua, & Mahakkanukrauh, ). An inaccuracy of 17.73/18.11 years was observed on the left/right vault sutures, respectively, using the Meindl and Lovejoy method in male Athenians (Xanthopoulou, Valakos, Youlatos, & Nikita, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%