2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age estimation of Hispanic children using the London Atlas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the entire sample, the London Atlas showed a statistically significant value of overestimation in the population of Hispanic children, with a difference of +0.35 years (SD =0.89 years). The result of the present study corresponds with McCloe et al, and Ashraf et al's findings reveal a significant overestimation in age, with a difference of +0.33 years (SD =0.61 years) [ 13 , 17 ]. This suggests that the growth and development of the dataset used in establishing Al Qahtani's technique differs from existing Surabaya population studies and that more research is needed to determine which element has a more significant impact on resulting in disparities in dental age [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the entire sample, the London Atlas showed a statistically significant value of overestimation in the population of Hispanic children, with a difference of +0.35 years (SD =0.89 years). The result of the present study corresponds with McCloe et al, and Ashraf et al's findings reveal a significant overestimation in age, with a difference of +0.33 years (SD =0.61 years) [ 13 , 17 ]. This suggests that the growth and development of the dataset used in establishing Al Qahtani's technique differs from existing Surabaya population studies and that more research is needed to determine which element has a more significant impact on resulting in disparities in dental age [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The new atlas covered as much of the developing dentition as possible, and all ages were represented. The London Atlas accuracy has been evaluated in various demographics to guarantee that it is a global, practical, and all-encompassing method [10] [13,17]. This suggests that the growth and development of the dataset used in establishing Al Qahtani's technique differs from existing Surabaya population studies and that more research is needed to determine which element has a more significant impact on resulting in disparities in dental age [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sousa et al [ 2 ] explained how the utilization of population-specific formulae may be essential for more accurate age estimation, thus highlighting the importance of establishing population-specific databases. According to McCloe et al [ 33 ], the applicability of the London Atlas should be assessed in different ethnic groups to determine if inter-population variability exists. In addition, Esan and Schepartz [ 13 ] reported that dental development charts and tables based on mixed population samples may not be accurate for specific age estimation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu tekniğin uygulanabilirliği daha az sayıda ülkede değerlendirilmiş olsa da kullanılabilir bir yöntem olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. [31][32][33] Türk popülasyonunda Londra Atlas tekniğinin değerlendirildiği sınırlı sayıda çalışma yapılmıştır. 25 Bu çalışmada da benzer olarak Türk toplumunda bireyin 18 yaşından büyük olup olmadığını belirleyebilmek için iki yöntemin birleştirilme olasılığına bakıldığında bu iki yöntemin ölçüm ve evreleme olarak farklı teknikler kullanmasına rağmen uyumluluklarının 0.813'lük kappa değeriyle çok iyi düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified