2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age favoured overall survival in a large population-based Danish patient cohort treated with anti-PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitor for metastatic melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, emerging evidence suggests that older age might contribute to clinical benefits for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors [41,42]. The association of age with improved response to anti-PD1 therapy has recently been observed in a large cohort of Danish metastatic melanoma patients; patients between ages 70-80 years had significantly longer OS and PFS compared with younger patients [43]. Furthermore, Perier-Muzet et al indicated that old age may improve the anti-PD1 response without increasing the risk for severe adverse events [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, emerging evidence suggests that older age might contribute to clinical benefits for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors [41,42]. The association of age with improved response to anti-PD1 therapy has recently been observed in a large cohort of Danish metastatic melanoma patients; patients between ages 70-80 years had significantly longer OS and PFS compared with younger patients [43]. Furthermore, Perier-Muzet et al indicated that old age may improve the anti-PD1 response without increasing the risk for severe adverse events [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in the tumor melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal-cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer [5][6][7][8] Presence of CD8+tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes melanoma, NSCLC, renal-cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer [5][6][7]9,10] High tumor mutational burden or neoantigen burden melanoma, NSCLC, colorectal cancer, urothelial carcinoma [5,11,12] Presence of intratumoral major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II expression melanoma [5,13] Presence of intratumoral interferon-γ-immune gene signature melanoma, head and neck cancer [5,14] Low interleukin (IL)-6 expression in the tumor colorectal cancer [15] Peripheral blood count: low absolute neutrophils, low absolute monocytes, low myeloid-derived suppressor cells, high FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, high lymphocytes, high eosinophils, high CD19−HLA-DR+ myeloid cells, high CD14+CD16b−HLA-DRhi monocytes melanoma, NSCLC [5,[16][17][18] Low level of c-reactive protein (CRP) in the serum, low relative eosinophil count uveal melanoma [19] Serum proteome analysis: BDX008 melanoma [20] An alternative approach to the search of predictive biomarkers sensu stricto is the identification of predictive biomarkers which are determined under checkpoint inhibitor therapy but before evidence by radiologic imaging of response to therapy [18,21,22]. Table 2 provides an overview of treatment response monitoring biomarkers.…”
Section: Biomarker Cancer Entity Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially combined checkpoint inhibition targeting CTLA4 as well as PD-1 is associated not only with the best therapeutic response but also with a significantly increased rate of severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) [4]. Hence, research has focused on predictive biomarkers in order to determine prior to therapy which patients and tumors might respond to checkpoint inhibitors and which patients might develop severe side effects [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Table 1 provides an overview of predictive biomarkers in the strict sense that these biomarkers have been determined prior to the start of therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What could be the consequences for the daily management of elderly patients according to primary tumors? For melanoma patients, Checkmate 066 study and additional cohort studies of patients aged over 80 have confirmed the benefit of ICIs (23,24). The only issue is to consider or not the addition of an anti-CTLA-4 agent according to the geriatric assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%