2002
DOI: 10.1080/1090102020230204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age, gender, socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, temperament, and actual social and cognitive competence as factors contributing to preservice teachers’ perceptions of preschool children's social and cognitive competence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dependency of effect sizes was modeled using a three-level meta-analytic model such that variance between studies was modeled at Level 3, variance between effect sizes from the same study was modeled at Level 2, and sample variance was modeled at Level 1 (see Assink et al, 2018; Harrer et al, 2019). In the current meta-analysis, several studies reported on multiple effect sizes from a single sample, including reporting on multiple: (a) temperament constructs (e.g., fear and anger; Blair & Peters, 2003), (b) temperament informants (e.g., parent and teacher; Taylor et al, 2014), (c) social competence informants (e.g., teacher and peers; Gulay, 2012), (d) types of temperament measure (e.g., report and observation; Porter, 2009), and/or (e) types of social competence measure (e.g., reported social skills and sociometrics; Pettit, 1999). In such cases, multiple effect sizes were nested within sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dependency of effect sizes was modeled using a three-level meta-analytic model such that variance between studies was modeled at Level 3, variance between effect sizes from the same study was modeled at Level 2, and sample variance was modeled at Level 1 (see Assink et al, 2018; Harrer et al, 2019). In the current meta-analysis, several studies reported on multiple effect sizes from a single sample, including reporting on multiple: (a) temperament constructs (e.g., fear and anger; Blair & Peters, 2003), (b) temperament informants (e.g., parent and teacher; Taylor et al, 2014), (c) social competence informants (e.g., teacher and peers; Gulay, 2012), (d) types of temperament measure (e.g., report and observation; Porter, 2009), and/or (e) types of social competence measure (e.g., reported social skills and sociometrics; Pettit, 1999). In such cases, multiple effect sizes were nested within sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, this study use field note to documenting all the data. The students' positional identity were analyzed and classify based on this table, (Pettit & Sugawara, 2002) In order to get the validating the accuracy data this study following Creswell The study analyse 40 students' writing literacy narratives. The data were shown on the table, there was only taken some sample to describe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by Jussim's (1986) integrated theory of self-fulfilling prophecies. It is critical we prepare pre-service teachers to have the expectation that all children are capable of learning, regardless of ethnicity, gender, age or socioeconomic factors (Pettit & Sugawara, 2001). …”
Section: Cultural Competence In a Multicultural Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%