1974
DOI: 10.1080/19485565.1974.9988102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age heaping in recent national censuses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2. A classical example of heaping is the tendency for people to report their ages in multiples of 5 (e.g., Stockwell and Wicks 1974).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. A classical example of heaping is the tendency for people to report their ages in multiples of 5 (e.g., Stockwell and Wicks 1974).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, however, the variety of ultimate contextual factors is likely to affect such patterns. In their pioneering studies, Nagi, Stockwell and Snavley (1973), and Stockwell and Wicks (1974), found that the magnitude of error in age reporting in a population is closely related to the latter's level of modernization as measured by a host of socio-economic indicators (e.g. the proportion of persons economically active, the percentage literate and the proportion of people working in the non-agricultural sector).…”
Section: Age Heaping In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heaping in self-reports often occurs in multiples of 5 or 10 and is not cigarette specific. 14,15,28–30 For cigarette smokers, heaping at 10 or 20 (half-pack or full-pack of cigarettes) may impact the assessment of nicotine dependence, specifically with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) because cut-points of this measure occur in counts of 10 (FTND categories: 10 or less, 11–20, 21–30, 31+). Heaping in self-reports, that differs from actual consumption, even by a few cigarettes, can lead to incorrect FTND classification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%