1968
DOI: 10.1029/jb073i006p02277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age of Precambrian events in the Northeastern Front Range, Colorado

Abstract: Precambrian metasedimentary rocks of the northeastern Front Range have undergone a long and complex geologic history involving multiple periods of metamorphism, deformation, and intrusive activity. The first event following sedimentation involved deformation which produced large east‐west isoclinal folds and metamorphism in the greenschist facies and possibly higher. It has been impossible to date this first event by radiometric techniques. The second major event was a period of dominantly medium‐ to high‐grad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rocks underlying this area are of similar origin and are extremely old (Peterman et al 1968, Madole 1982. Variations in the rock's chemical content and weathering rates, especially in the cold alpine environment, are unlikely to produce the differences seen in figure 10.…”
Section: Effects Of Transport Processes On Soil Biogeochemical Processesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The rocks underlying this area are of similar origin and are extremely old (Peterman et al 1968, Madole 1982. Variations in the rock's chemical content and weathering rates, especially in the cold alpine environment, are unlikely to produce the differences seen in figure 10.…”
Section: Effects Of Transport Processes On Soil Biogeochemical Processesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The [Peterman et al, 1968], which underlies 80% of the watershed and crops out mostly above tree line, and Precambrian Silver Plume granite (1450 Ma) [Peterman et al, 1968], which intrudes the gneiss and underlies the lower 20% of the basin. The mineralogy of the two units is similar; primary minerals consist of quartz (28-41%), plagioclase (25-30%), biotite (6-16%), microcline (9-34%), and sillimanite (0-6%) [Cole, 1977].…”
Section: Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] M 3 metamorphism was long regarded as a purely retrogressive event during the waning stages of M 2 [Peterman et al, 1968;Nesse, 1984]. However, recent thermobarometric and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar studies [Hodgins, 1997;Selverstone et al, 1997; correlate M 3 metamorphism with a regional heating event throughout the Front Range circa 1.4 Ga that locally resulted in prograde growth of new garnet, andalusite, and staurolite.…”
Section: Proterozoic Metamorphism and Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent deformation accompanied peak Early Proterozoic metamorphism and locally resulted in the formation of two additional fold generations and cleavages. M 2 is regarded as the major regional metamorphism that produced garnet, staurolite, andalusite, and sillimanite in the northern Front Range and has been broadly constrained between 1.70-1.75 Ga [Hedge et al, 1967;Peterman et al, 1968;Braddock and Cole, 1979;Nesse, 1984]. The timing of M 2 metamorphism is roughly coeval with the intrusion of Routt Suite plutonic rocks.…”
Section: Proterozoic Metamorphism and Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%