2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20010115)20:1<47::aid-sim613>3.0.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-period-cohort modelling of breast cancer incidence in the Nordic countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This would have led to some of the period effects that were found. The period effects shown in Table 4 reflect changes that affect all age cohorts at a given time and apart from under-reporting in the earliest periods may be due to changes related to health services and breast cancer detection (Rostgaard et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would have led to some of the period effects that were found. The period effects shown in Table 4 reflect changes that affect all age cohorts at a given time and apart from under-reporting in the earliest periods may be due to changes related to health services and breast cancer detection (Rostgaard et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that increased cancer detection activities, notably mammographic screening examinations, may enhance incidence rates (Persson et al, 1993;Wun et al, 1995;Rostgaard et al, 2001). Hong Kong, however, has never had an organised screening programme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant increase in incidence recorded only in the LS area (of 14.2%), particularly in women aged 55 -64 years (21.0%), could be explained by earlier detection. Increases in incidence have been recorded in other Western countries in relation to screening (Quinn and Allen, 1995;Garne et al, 1997;Persson et al, 1998;Chu et al, 1996;Rostgaard et al, 2001). In the ES area, no significant increase in incidence was detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] There is, however, a little information on how the separate phases of an invitational program differ from each other in terms of influencing the incidence. [1][2][3] It is also reasonable to assume that the impact of different program phases on breast cancer incidence is dependent on women's age and stage of cancer, which are issues that have, to our knowledge, never been studied jointly before.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%