2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related auditory deficits in temporal processing in F-344 rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
73
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
8
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these compensatory mechanisms come at the cost of reduced synchrony of neural representations (Rabang et al 2012). This could result in the some of the decreased EFR amplitudes with age observed in this study and elsewhere (Clinard et al 2010;Parthasarathy and Bartlett 2011;Anderson et al 2012). However, modeling the loss of AN fibers and synapses recreated the majority of the trends observed due to age in this study, suggesting peripheral contributions for the decrease in EFR amplitudes at high SNRs and large AM depths.…”
Section: Effects Of Aging In Processing Simultaneous Sam Tonessupporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, these compensatory mechanisms come at the cost of reduced synchrony of neural representations (Rabang et al 2012). This could result in the some of the decreased EFR amplitudes with age observed in this study and elsewhere (Clinard et al 2010;Parthasarathy and Bartlett 2011;Anderson et al 2012). However, modeling the loss of AN fibers and synapses recreated the majority of the trends observed due to age in this study, suggesting peripheral contributions for the decrease in EFR amplitudes at high SNRs and large AM depths.…”
Section: Effects Of Aging In Processing Simultaneous Sam Tonessupporting
confidence: 50%
“…5). Other studies have also reported agerelated changes at lower SNRs, lower modulation depths, differing envelope shapes and frequency modulation (He et al 2007;Parthasarathy et al 2010;Parthasarathy and Bartlett 2011;Trujillo and Razak 2013). Whether these differences are due to changes in central processing, or some other peripheral effect that is yet to be accounted for, remains to be explored.…”
Section: Effects Of Aging In Processing Simultaneous Sam Tonesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Human studies using FFRs have found changes in neural timing and precision with age (Tremblay et al 2002(Tremblay et al , 2003Clinard et al 2010;Anderson et al 2012;Clinard and Tremblay 2013). Changes with age have also been observed at the level of single neurons in terms of decreased temporal coding and changes in rate coding in the dorsal cochlear nuclei (Schatteman et al 2008), inferior colliculus (IC) (Walton et al 1998;Palombi et al 2001;Walton et al 2002;Walton 2010;Rabang et al 2012), and auditory cortex (Mendelson and Ricketts 2001) and at a population level using EFRs in rodent aging models (Parthasarathy et al 2010;Parthasarathy and Bartlett 2011;Parthasarathy and Bartlett 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is not clear why HI listeners should be more biased than the NH listeners toward the "asynchronous" response, the explanation in terms of uncertainty about the decision appears more likely. Although the correlation shown in Figure 5B did not reveal a systematic relationship between the peak of the synchronous-response functions and listeners' age, some of the differences between the data from the NH and HI listeners may reflect a degraded coding of timing information due to aging and not due to the cochlear hearing loss per se (Fitzgibbons et al 2007;Parthasarathy and Bartlett 2011).…”
Section: Perceived Across-frequency Synchrony and The Cochlear Latencmentioning
confidence: 77%