2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related changes in porosity and mineralization and in-service damage accumulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…101 In contrast, cases and controls had similar indentation modulus and hardness. This suggests compensation for reduced mineralisation by a stiffer organic phase in hip fracture cases, making the bone tissue potentially less tough, 99,100 consistent with the finding of Norman et al 102 that reduced mineralisation is positively associated with diffuse damage and microcrack density.…”
Section: Mineralised Bone Tissue Heterogeneitysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…101 In contrast, cases and controls had similar indentation modulus and hardness. This suggests compensation for reduced mineralisation by a stiffer organic phase in hip fracture cases, making the bone tissue potentially less tough, 99,100 consistent with the finding of Norman et al 102 that reduced mineralisation is positively associated with diffuse damage and microcrack density.…”
Section: Mineralised Bone Tissue Heterogeneitysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Relevant to the present discussion, microcrack accumulation is reportedly associated with the age-related decrease in the density of osteocyte lacunae [70]. Microdamage accumulation beyond a certain threshold appears to adversely affect the bone mechanical properties [71].…”
Section: Microcracksmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, the fact that some bone creep is either permanent, or recovered very slowly [14], suggests additional mechanisms unrelated to fluid flow. Possibilities include the propagation of microcracks [33][34][35], slipping between osteons [36], viscoelastic deformation of collagen [27], and slipping between [28,37] or within [28] hydroxyapatite crystals. Plastic deformation must be involved, because total strains (creep plus elastic) measured in the present experiment greatly exceed those at the elastic limit of trabecular bone [30,38].…”
Section: Explanation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%