this study evaluated age-related trabecular meshwork (tM) height variations in the eyes of adults in different age groups. We hypothesised that a reduction in TM occurs with increasing age. This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital between January 2015 and June 2019. We randomly included 250 eyes of 125 patients who underwent anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). The distance from the scleral spur to Schwalbe's line in patients with normal open anterior chamber angle was measured using AS-OCT. Results were stratified based on patients' age group-≤40, 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, 71-80, and 81-92 years. Thereafter, the results were compared among the age groups. The mean TM height of the patients was 770.929 ± 76.776 μm. TM height was 853.188 ± 94.117 μm in patients aged ≤40 years; it was 815.309 ± 75.723, 798.115 ± 66.040, 770.942 ± 52.774, 726.716 ± 63.979, and 715.968 ± 63.403 μm in patients aged 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, 71-80, and 81-92 years, respectively. The tM height tended to decrease with increasing age (p < 0.001). TM height was significantly shorter in older patients than in younger ones. Therefore, TM height may change with age and may contribute to increased glaucoma risk and prevalence. Scientific RepoRtS | (2020) 10:7115 | https://doi.Mean TM height categorised by age and sex. The mean TM height of the patients in our study was 770.929 ± 76.776 μm. The mean TM height among men was 764.169 ± 85.300 μm and that among women was 776.938 ± 67.120 μm; there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.1911). The mean TM height of patients aged ≤40 years was 853.188 ± 94.117 μm and those of patients aged 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, 71-80, and 81-92 years were 815.309 ± 75.723 μm, 798.115 ± 66.040 μm, 770.942 ± 52.774 μm, 726.716 ± 63.979 μm, and 715.968 ± 63.403 μm, respectively. TM height tended to decrease with increasing patient age (P < 0.001).These results were validated with post-hoc analysis using the least significant difference (no correction value) and Bonferroni correction (correction value) methods (Table 2 and Fig. 1).Scientific RepoRtS | (2020) 10:7115 | https://doi.