2016
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise

Abstract: Vocabulary size has been suggested as a useful measure of “verbal abilities” that correlates with speech recognition scores. Knowing more words is linked to better speech recognition. How vocabulary knowledge translates to general speech recognition mechanisms, how these mechanisms relate to offline speech recognition scores, and how they may be modulated by acoustical distortion or age, is less clear. Age-related differences in linguistic measures may predict age-related differences in speech recognition in n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, SiN comprehension 461 strongly depends on vocabulary knowledge. 21,70,71 And the level of CTS in noise relates to the 462 listeners' level of comprehension. 35,40,41 This therefore suggests that the robustness of CTS to 463 babble noise depends on the level of comprehension, which in turn depends on how developed 464 is the mental lexicon.…”
Section: Robustness Of Cortical Speech Representation To Babble Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, SiN comprehension 461 strongly depends on vocabulary knowledge. 21,70,71 And the level of CTS in noise relates to the 462 listeners' level of comprehension. 35,40,41 This therefore suggests that the robustness of CTS to 463 babble noise depends on the level of comprehension, which in turn depends on how developed 464 is the mental lexicon.…”
Section: Robustness Of Cortical Speech Representation To Babble Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A success rate of 60% is mandatory to allow the participant to perform the other tasks of the VIPS test. The RTs to this task will be subtracted to the RTs on the other tasks in order to obtain an unbiased measure of access speed (i.e., excluding motor reaction in pressing a button or general processing speed, see Carroll et al 2016).…”
Section: Cognitive/linguistic Test Batterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in language acquisition, vocabulary size is related to how fast children access words online [77], and is a strong predictor of grammatical development (e.g., [30,78,79]). In adult language processing, variability in vocabulary knowledge predicts spoken lexical access in challenging conditions (e.g., [80,81]), and lexical frequencies can influence syntactic processing [82].…”
Section: Relationships Between Linguistic and Cognitive Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%