2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related differences in muscle recruitment and reaction-time performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study extends our previous investigations where participants and measurement procedures have been described in detail (Arnold et al, 2015;Bautmans et al, 2011). Here data from sixty-four community-dwelling elderly (32 males and 32 females, aged respectively 79.6 ± 4.1 and 79.6 ± 4.9 years) were analysed (see Table 1).…”
Section: Participantssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study extends our previous investigations where participants and measurement procedures have been described in detail (Arnold et al, 2015;Bautmans et al, 2011). Here data from sixty-four community-dwelling elderly (32 males and 32 females, aged respectively 79.6 ± 4.1 and 79.6 ± 4.9 years) were analysed (see Table 1).…”
Section: Participantssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…We recently found an association between circulating cytokines and contractile muscle properties (twitch force) during a fatigue protocol, in healthy community dwelling elderly (Arnold et al, 2017). In another study we provided evidence for the presence of an early antagonist muscle coactivation in community-dwelling elderly during a reaction time (RT) test, using fast dynamic movements (Arnold et al, 2015). From a mechanical point of view, this early antagonist coactivation may counteract the agonist muscle, resulting in delay in start of the movement, longer RT and reduced net force production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Reaction time is defined as the amount of time required to initiate motor response to a stimulus [ 34 ]. It is a component of neuromuscular control [ 35 ], and a faster muscle reaction time suggests earlier muscle recruitment for joint stability [ 36 , 37 ]. Knee joint stability is affected by co-activation and neuromuscular control of ligaments and muscles of the knee joint such as the ACL, quadriceps, hamstrings, and triceps surae [ 10 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle reaction can be de ned as the muscle recruitment capacity for joint stability while performing a functional task; [29,30] thus, rapid muscle reaction time is an important factor for increased joint stability. [30,31] The quadriceps, hamstring, and GCM muscles all contribute to the stability of the knee joint. Lloyd & Buchanan reported that the co-contraction of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles directly supports the valgus/varus moments at the knee joint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%