“…Any single operationalization of ERN makes assumptions about the neural activity of interest, and those assumptions ultimately impact interpretations. Metaanalytic work supports the possibility that variations in how ERN is recorded, analyzed, and scored alter interpretations by showing that ERN findings can be moderated by task (Lutz et al, 2021;Martin et al, 2018;Mathews et al, 2012;Pasion & Barbosa, 2019;Riesel, 2019), dataprocessing pipeline (Clayson, 2020), and scoring procedures (Boen et al, 2022;Pasion & Barbosa, 2019). Further evidence comes from a multiverse analysis of different data-processing pipelines and scoring procedures (3456 total ERN scores per person) that indicated that different methodological decisions changed the final ERN average amplitudes and variability of scores (Clayson, Baldwin, Rocha, et al, 2021).…”