2017
DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Temporal Envelope and Spectral Cues in a Speech Segment

Abstract: OBJECTIVE As people age, they experience reduced temporal processing abilities. This results in poorer ability to understand speech, particularly for degraded input signals. Cochlear implants (CIs) convey speech information via the temporal envelopes of a spectrally degraded input signal. Because there is an increasing number of older CI users, there is a need to understand how temporal processing changes with age. Therefore, the goal of this study was to quantify age-related reduction in temporal processing a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
43
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No research has specifically analyzed the effects of NBinterrupted vocoded speech and the PR effect in ONH listeners. ONH listeners generally show slower temporal processing for complex stimuli like speech (Goupell et al, 2017;Fitzgibbons and Gordon-Salant, 1996) and less precise encoding of the temporal properties of speech subcortically (Anderson et al, 2012). When speech is degraded by a vocoder to simulate aspects of CI processing, spectral resolution is reduced and temporal envelopes of the signal must be relied upon for accurate speech perception (Shannon et al, 1995).…”
Section: B Pr In Onh Listenersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No research has specifically analyzed the effects of NBinterrupted vocoded speech and the PR effect in ONH listeners. ONH listeners generally show slower temporal processing for complex stimuli like speech (Goupell et al, 2017;Fitzgibbons and Gordon-Salant, 1996) and less precise encoding of the temporal properties of speech subcortically (Anderson et al, 2012). When speech is degraded by a vocoder to simulate aspects of CI processing, spectral resolution is reduced and temporal envelopes of the signal must be relied upon for accurate speech perception (Shannon et al, 1995).…”
Section: B Pr In Onh Listenersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slower temporal processing and less precise temporal encoding associated with aging may have influenced how ONH participants perceived and utilized NB interruptions in the present study. Older participants have less ability to perceive and encode sudden temporal changes in the speech signal (Anderson et al, 2012;Fitzgibbons and Gordon-Salant, 1996;Goupell et al, 2017), so the perception of the rapid changes between speech and NB interruptions may have resulted in a stronger, more fused percept of the two stimuli. A more fused percept would result in a stronger auditory illusion of the speech continuing through the noise, and therefore a stronger PR effect.…”
Section: B Aging Benefits For Pr Of Degraded Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even listeners with substantive impairments such as listeners with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (Wang et al, 2016) or who use auditory brainstem implants (Azadpour & McKay, 2014) have relatively good envelope perception. Recent data suggest that the relative weight placed on envelope (vs. spectral cues) may change with age but not with hearing loss per se (Goupell et al, 2017;Toscano & Lansing, 2019).…”
Section: Other Contributions To the Cue Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sine-vocoded stimuli were created using MATLAB routines. The original stimuli were bandpass filtered (thirdorder Butterworth, using the "filtfilt" forward-and-reverse MATLAB filtering function) to minimize temporal distortion (e.g., Goupell et al, 2017) into four or eight contiguous channels. The corner frequencies of these filters spanned 200 to 5000 Hz and were logarithmically spaced (see Figure 1 for center frequencies).…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%