Abstract:AIMTo investigate the functional effects of abnormal esophagogastric (EGJ) measurements in asymptomatic healthy volunteers over eighty years of age.METHODSData from 30 young controls (11 M, mean age 37 ± 11 years) and 15 aged subjects (9 M, 85 ± 4 years) were compared for novel metrics of EGJ-function: EGJ-contractile integral (EGJ-CI), “total” EGJ-CI and bolus flow time (BFT). Data were acquired using a 3.2 mm, 25 pressure (1 cm spacing) and 12 impedance segment (2 cm) solid-state catheter (Unisensor and MMS … Show more
“…Our data suggest that EGJ‐CI is not affected by age, which agrees with a report by Cock et al, who noted similar EGJ‐CI in younger and older individuals, even at ages higher than those evaluated in this study 22 . In contrast, when grouping by sex, female volunteers had higher EGJ‐CI and conventional LES pressure metrics using the Medtronic system (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…3 This lack of consistency suggests that EGJ-CI is best utilized as an adjunctive metric rather than providing a definitive zone of normality, consistent with the Lyon consensus recommendation. 5 Our data suggest that EGJ-CI is not affected by age, which agrees with a report by Cock et al, who noted similar EGJ-CI in younger and older individuals, even at ages higher than those evaluated in this study 22 . In contrast, when grouping by sex, female volunteers had higher EGJ-CI and conventional LES pressure metrics using the Medtronic system (Table 2).…”
Section: Given Recognition Of CD Contribution and Respiratory Variationsupporting
Background: Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) and EGJ morphology are high-resolution manometry (HRM) metrics that assess EGJ barrier function. Normative data standardized across world regions and HRM manufacturers are limited.Methods: Our aim was to determine normative EGJ metrics in a large international cohort of healthy volunteers undergoing HRM (Medtronic, Laborie, and Diversatek software) acquired from 16 countries in four world regions. EGJ-CI was calculated by the same two investigators using a distal contractile integral-like measurement across the EGJ for three respiratory cycles and corrected for respiration (mm Hg cm), using manufacturer-specific software tools. EGJ morphology was designated according to Chicago Classification v3.0. Median EGJ-CI values were calculated across age, genders, HRM systems, and regions.
“…Our data suggest that EGJ‐CI is not affected by age, which agrees with a report by Cock et al, who noted similar EGJ‐CI in younger and older individuals, even at ages higher than those evaluated in this study 22 . In contrast, when grouping by sex, female volunteers had higher EGJ‐CI and conventional LES pressure metrics using the Medtronic system (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…3 This lack of consistency suggests that EGJ-CI is best utilized as an adjunctive metric rather than providing a definitive zone of normality, consistent with the Lyon consensus recommendation. 5 Our data suggest that EGJ-CI is not affected by age, which agrees with a report by Cock et al, who noted similar EGJ-CI in younger and older individuals, even at ages higher than those evaluated in this study 22 . In contrast, when grouping by sex, female volunteers had higher EGJ-CI and conventional LES pressure metrics using the Medtronic system (Table 2).…”
Section: Given Recognition Of CD Contribution and Respiratory Variationsupporting
Background: Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) and EGJ morphology are high-resolution manometry (HRM) metrics that assess EGJ barrier function. Normative data standardized across world regions and HRM manufacturers are limited.Methods: Our aim was to determine normative EGJ metrics in a large international cohort of healthy volunteers undergoing HRM (Medtronic, Laborie, and Diversatek software) acquired from 16 countries in four world regions. EGJ-CI was calculated by the same two investigators using a distal contractile integral-like measurement across the EGJ for three respiratory cycles and corrected for respiration (mm Hg cm), using manufacturer-specific software tools. EGJ morphology was designated according to Chicago Classification v3.0. Median EGJ-CI values were calculated across age, genders, HRM systems, and regions.
“…Eleven pharyngeal [10,34,39,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50] and sixteen esophageal studies [23,24,25,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62] were identified and results described in Table 3 (summary) and Table 4 (measurements).…”
We undertook a systematic review of swallowing biomechanics, as assessed using pharyngeal and esophageal manometry in healthy or dysphagic older individuals aged over 60 years of age, comparing findings to studies of younger participants. PRISMA-P methodology was used to identify, select, and evaluate eligible studies. Across studies, older participants had lower upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressures and evidence of decreased UES relaxation when compared to younger groups. Intrabolus pressures (IBP) above the UES were increased, demonstrating flow resistance at the UES. Pharyngeal contractility was increased and prolonged in some studies, which may be considered as an attempt to compensate for UES flow resistance. Esophageal studies show evidence of reduced contractile amplitudes in the distal esophagus, and an increased frequency of failed peristaltic events, in concert with reduced lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, in the oldest subjects. Major motility disorders occurred in similar proportions in older and young patients in most clinical studies, but some studies show increases in achalasia or spastic motility in older dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain patients. Overall, study qualities were moderate with a low likelihood of bias. There were few clinical studies specifically focused on swallowing outcomes in older patient groups and more such studies are needed.
“…Similar changes were also seen in relation to participant age and BMI, suggesting that these factors also increase esophageal emptying resistance. Based on previous studies, older age has shown to reduce esophageal compliance and neurogenic relaxation of the LES, while higher BMI results in higher gastric pressure due to increased abdominal fat …”
Background
Abdominal compression has been implemented as a provocative maneuver in high‐resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) to “challenge” normal esophageal physiology with the aim of revealing abnormal motor patterns which may explain symptoms. In this study, we measured the effects of abdominal compression on esophageal functioning utilizing novel pressure‐impedance parameters and attempted to identify differences between healthy controls and globus patients.
Methods
Twenty‐two healthy volunteers (aged 23‐32 years, 41% female) and 22 globus patients (aged 23‐72 years, 68% female) were evaluated with HRIM using a 3.2‐mm water perfused manometric and impedance catheter. All participants received 10 × 5 mL liquid swallows; healthy controls also received 10 × 5 mL liquid swallows with abdominal compression created using an inflatable cuff. All swallows were analyzed to assess esophageal pressure topography (EPT) and pressure‐flow metrics, indicative of distension pressure, flow timing and bolus clearance were derived.
Key Results
The effect of abdominal compression was shown as a greater contractile vigor of the distal esophagus by EPT and higher distension pressure based on pressure‐flow metrics. Age and body mass index also increased contractile vigor and distension pressure. Globus patients were similar to controls.
Conclusions and Interferences
Intrabolus pressure and contractile vigor are indicative of the physiological modulation of bolus transport mechanisms. Provocative testing by abdominal compression induces changes in these esophageal bolus dynamics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.