1995
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199503000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
132
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
10
132
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when a male subject with clenched muscles falling from a height of 1.2m was modeled, peak forces of 16 kN were estimated. Although this value exceeds the threshold measured in this study, it is likely that the femur or pelvis (rather than the ceramic liner) would fracture under these loads [18,19,20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, when a male subject with clenched muscles falling from a height of 1.2m was modeled, peak forces of 16 kN were estimated. Although this value exceeds the threshold measured in this study, it is likely that the femur or pelvis (rather than the ceramic liner) would fracture under these loads [18,19,20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…To simulate sideways falling, the most commonly used force direction from previous experimental studies [10,32,33] was chosen. The femoral shaft was tilted at 10° with respect to the ground and the femoral neck was internally rotated by 15° (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The femoral shaft was tilted at 10° with respect to the ground and the femoral neck was internally rotated by 15° (Fig. 2) [10,32,33]. The individual impact force was estimated using the equation proposed by Bouxsein et al [34]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BMC divided by the area or volume of the bone estimates BMD. In laboratory studies, there is a high correlation (R 2 = 0.4-0.9) between BMD and the force needed to break a bone (8,9). Other determinants of bone strength include size (larger bones are stronger), macroscopic structure (long bones with greater cross-sectional areas are more resistant to bending), microscopic structure (microscopic cracks and loss of normal trabecular architecture weaken a bone), and the composition of bone proteins (abnormal collagen weakens bones).…”
Section: Measurement Of Bmdmentioning
confidence: 99%