BackgroundMany studies have shown topological alterations associated with age in population‐based brain morphological networks. However, it is not clear how individual brain morphological networks change with age across the lifespan.PurposeTo characterize age‐related topological changes in individual networks and investigate the relationships between individual‐ and group‐based brain networks at the nodal, modular, and connectome levels.Study TypeRetrospective analysis.PopulationOne hundred seventy‐nine healthy subjects (108 males and 71 females), aged 6–85 years with a median age of 32 years and an inter‐quartile range (IQR) of 26 years.Field Strength/SequenceT1‐weighted images using the magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequences.AssessmentTwo nodal‐level indicators (nodal similarity and node matching), five modular‐level indicators (modularity, intra/inter‐module similarity, adjusted mutual information [AMI], and module variation), and five connectome‐level indicators (global efficiency, characteristic path length, clustering coefficient, local efficiency, and individual contribution) were calculated in brain morphological networks. Regression models for different indicators were built to examine their lifetime trajectory patterns.Statistical TestsSingle‐sample t‐test, Mantel's test, Pearson correlation coefficient. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsAmong 68 nodes, 34 nodes showed significant age‐related patterns (all P < 0.05, FDR‐corrected) in nodal similarity, including linear decline and quadratic trends. The lifespan trajectory of the connectome‐level topological attributes of the individual networks presented U‐shaped or inverse U‐shaped trends with age. Between the individual‐ and group‐based brain networks, the average nodal similarity was 0.67 and the average AMI of module partitions was 0.57.Data ConclusionThe lifespan trajectories of the nodal similarity mainly followed linear decreasing and nonlinear trends, whereas the modularity and the global topological attributes exhibited nonlinear patterns. There was a high degree of consistency at both nodal similarity and modular division between the individual and group networks.Evidence Level1Technical EfficacyStage 1