1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00181945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related scopolamine effects on social and individual behaviour in rats

Abstract: The modulation of spontaneous (social and individual) behaviour as a function of the age of the rat (1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months) and of scopolamine dose (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg) was studied. Observations were conducted during the dark phase of the reverse light/dark schedule using a reintroduction procedure. Results showed a marked effect of scopolamine on most of the behavioural patterns considered. Environmental interaction was enhanced whilst agonistic and social active interactions (social grooming… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations agree with those of the present study, showing that social grooming was the major pattern of interaction in both control and asphyxiated rats after isolation for 1 week. Furthermore, social grooming has been reported to increase with age, while antagonistic interactions, including fighting, decreased [20]. A similar pattern has been described by Albonetti and Farabollini [21], reporting that after single and repeated restraint, their rats showed decreased fighting behavior paralleled by an increased allogrooming as an appeasing behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These observations agree with those of the present study, showing that social grooming was the major pattern of interaction in both control and asphyxiated rats after isolation for 1 week. Furthermore, social grooming has been reported to increase with age, while antagonistic interactions, including fighting, decreased [20]. A similar pattern has been described by Albonetti and Farabollini [21], reporting that after single and repeated restraint, their rats showed decreased fighting behavior paralleled by an increased allogrooming as an appeasing behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Given experimental findings suggesting that different forms of social behavior may be mediated by different neural systems [1,29,35] and, hence, may be differentially sensitive to social deprivation and variations in familiarity of the test situation, each form of social behavior was analyzed separately. Overall social activity, social investigation, contact behavior, and play fighting, as well as coefficient of social preference/avoidance and overall locomotor activity in the social context (total number of crossovers) were examined in the experimental subjects by using separate 4 (age) × 2 (housing condition) × 2 (test situation) × 2 (sex) analyses of variance (ANOVAs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies also used only an overall measure of social behavior (i.e., overall time spent in social interactions), even though the elementary behavioral acts summed together for these assessments (e.g., sniffing, grooming, chasing, following, crawling under or over, nape attacks, boxing, and wrestling) reflect separable and differentially regulated forms of interactive social behaviors that include social investigation, contact behavior, and play fighting. Each of these forms of social activity has a distinct ethological and ontogenetic pattern [17,20,32,35,39] and is affected differentially by drug treatments [1,29,35]. For instance, the ontogeny of play fighting demonstrates an inverted U-shaped pattern, with a peak being observed around P30-35 [18,19,20,35,39], whereas social investigation is more pronounced in adult than adolescent animals [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have demonstrated that aged rodents exhibit alterations in a number of behavioral domains, including impaired cognitive function (Barrientos et al, 2012; Foster, 2012; Gallagher and Rapp, 1997; Nomura and Okuma, 1999; Rosenzweig and Barnes, 2003), increased anxietylike (Boguszewski and Zagrodzka, 2002; Darwish et al, 2001; Frussa-Filho et al, 1991; Hunt et al, 2011; Imhof et al, 1993; Miyagawa et al, 1998) and depressive-like behaviors (Kiss et al, 2012; Moretti et al, 2011), decreased locomotor activity (Gage et al, 1984; Godbout et al, 2008; Hunt et al, 2011), and importantly, impaired social interaction (Andersen et al, 1999; Hunt et al, 2011; Markel et al, 1995; Mencio-Wszalek et al, 1992; Salchner et al, 2004; Shoji and Mizoguchi, 2011; Soffié and Bronchart, 1988). Aged male rats (14–30-months-old) have been reported to exhibit reduced play behavior (Soffié and Bronchart, 1988), fewer social interactions (Markel et al, 1995; Salchner et al, 2004), less social investigation (Andersen et al, 1999), and to engage in less contact with conspecifics (Hunt et al, 2011) relative to adolescent or young adult rats (1.5–6-months-old).…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aged male rats (14–30-months-old) have been reported to exhibit reduced play behavior (Soffié and Bronchart, 1988), fewer social interactions (Markel et al, 1995; Salchner et al, 2004), less social investigation (Andersen et al, 1999), and to engage in less contact with conspecifics (Hunt et al, 2011) relative to adolescent or young adult rats (1.5–6-months-old). Importantly, these aging-related social deficits are ubiquitous across many rat strains, including the Wistar (Andersen et al, 1999; Hunt et al, 2011; Markel et al, 1995; Soffié and Bronchart, 1988), Sprague-Dawley (Salchner et al, 2004), and Fischer 344/Brown Norway cross strains rats (Shoji and Mizoguchi, 2011), yet to our knowledge, only one study has examined potential sex differences in social behavior in aged animals. Hunt et al (2011) found that aged male and female Wistar rats (22–30 months) exhibited similar reductions in interaction with a novel age- and sex- matched social partner.…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%