2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related variations in the biomechanical properties of human sclera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
76
3
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
8
76
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…23,38 One possible explanation is that this is due to the dependence of corneal modulus of elasticity on the magnitude of tissue strain, but since our study was cross-sectional, we cannot determine causation. Unlike previous studies of cadaver eyes, 23,39 we did not find a relationship between Young’s modulus and subject age, likely because of our small sample size and clustering of our subjects in a fairly narrow age range (mean 51.4 ± 7.2 years; range 43–64 years). We also did not find a relationship between the modulus of elasticity and central corneal thickness or axial length.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…23,38 One possible explanation is that this is due to the dependence of corneal modulus of elasticity on the magnitude of tissue strain, but since our study was cross-sectional, we cannot determine causation. Unlike previous studies of cadaver eyes, 23,39 we did not find a relationship between Young’s modulus and subject age, likely because of our small sample size and clustering of our subjects in a fairly narrow age range (mean 51.4 ± 7.2 years; range 43–64 years). We also did not find a relationship between the modulus of elasticity and central corneal thickness or axial length.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in glycation of collagen fibrils with age may be a factor in increasing their cross-sectional area (Keeley et al, 1984; Malik et al, 1992). Increased mechanical stiffness of the sclera with age has been reported in human (Avetisov et al, 1984; Friberg and Lace, 1988; Coudrillier et al 2012; Geraghty et al, 2012), monkey (Girard et al, 2009), and mouse (Myers et al, 2010), in part due to increasing intermolecular collagen crosslinking with age (Curtin, 1969; Ihanamaki et al, 2001; Girard et al, 2009). Fazio et al (2013) showed that the strains in the peripapillary sclera were significantly lower in older human specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, with increasing age, the sclera increases in stiffness, due to the accumulation of nonenzymatic glycation-type cross-links of collagen fibrils with age (Coudrillier et al, 2012; Schultz et al, 2008). This age-related increase in stiffness is greatest in the anterior sclera, followed by the equatorial and then posterior sclera (Geraghty et al, 2012). …”
Section: Development Of the Scleramentioning
confidence: 99%