Age similarities and differences in spontaneous use of emotion regulation tactics across five laboratory tasks.

Abstract

Theories of emotional aging have proposed that age differences in emotion regulation may partly explain why older adults report high levels of emotional well-being despite declines in other domains. The current research examined age differences and similarities in emotion regulatory tactic preferences across 5 laboratory tasks designed to measure the strategies within the process model of emotion regulation (situation selection, situation modification, attentional deployment, cognitive change, and response modulation). An adult life span sample (ages 20 -78, N ϭ 225) completed tasks offering opportunities to use tactics that decrease negative, increase positive, or engage with negative aspects of the situation. Overall, age similarity in tactic preferences (supported by Bayes factors) was much more common than age differences. Across the sample, participants favored avoiding negative aspects in situation selection and modification and seeking or introducing positive aspects in attentional deployment and cognitive change. Self-reports of affect suggest that older adults were more responsive to positive aspects of the situation, although they did not seek them out more than other age groups. These results cast some doubt on the assumption that spontaneous emotion regulation is more likely in older age, but rather show that both younger and older adults show similar preferences in the absence of other strong goals. This novel approach of examining strategies across the process model highlights benefits of comparing multiple tactics within strategies not only when examining possible age differences, but also when studying patterns of emotion regulation in general.

Emotion depends on context, culture and their interaction: evidence from effective connectivity

“…Despite differences in mean age between the norming group and the experiment’s participants, the fear-neutral categorization is not expected to be influenced by age; across the adult age span, people tend to report the same intensity of negative affective states in daily life ( Carstensen et al. , 2000 ), and age-related differences in emotion appear to be a product of situation selection rather than age ( Livingstone and Isaacowitz, 2019 ). Fear and neutral images differed significantly in ratings of valence ( F = 169.51, P < 0.001) and arousal ( F = 494.42, P < 0.001).…”

Affect in the Aging Brain: A Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis of Older Vs. Younger Adult Affective Experience and Perception

“…Per our prior meta-analytic work, we specifically focused on studies designed to manipulate affective experiences (e.g., feelings of emotion) or affective perceptions (e.g., seeing or hearing affect or emotion in others' facial, bodily, or vocal behaviors) and excluded studies designed to explicitly measure the neural basis of learning, memory, priming, or pain given that these types of tasks are likely to involve additional psychological and hence neural processes (e.g., studies assessing brain activity during affective learning reveal neural processes linked to learning in addition to affect). Furthermore, although there are hypotheses that older adults might be better at engaging explicit emotion regulation Sands, Garbacz, & Isaacowitz, 2016;Scheibe & Blanchard-Fields, 2009; although see Livingstone & Isaacowitz, 2019), we excluded these kinds of studies, as explicit emotion regulation involves effortful cognitive control processes that may be distinct from affective experiences or perceptions. This exclusion criterion is consistent with our prior meta-analytic work which also excludes 14, 73.7 years 24 (9), 23.9 years Affect induction with pictures; subjects judged whether objects were animate or common objects High arousal negative, high arousal positive, neutral Leclerc and Kensinger (2011) 1 9 ( 1 1 ) , 71.7 years 20 (10), 23.4 years Affect induction with pictures and words while judging whether objects were animate or common objects High arousal negative, high arousal positive, neutral Murty et al (2009) 3 0 ( 1 4 ) , 61.2 years 30 (14), 25.6 years Affect induction with pictures while judging whether picture was indoors or outdoors "Aversive" (high arousal negative), neutral Paradiso et al (1997) Affect induction with film clips Happy, fearful, "fear-disgust," neutral St.…”

A Perceptual Approach to Aging: Latent Aging

“…Health is an important driving force for the individual to hold onto life (Rowe & Kahn, 1987;Rowe & Kahn, 1997;Rubinstein et al, 1992;Schulz & Heckhausen, 1996). The individual can be motivated through social networks and stabilize the complex emotions s/he experiences in her/his cognitive processes (Rutter et al, 2019;Livingstone & Isaacowitz, 2019;Carstensen et al, 2003). However, psychology is a latent factor that can affect all of these factors.…”