2012
DOI: 10.5402/2012/721329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age Variance in the Survival of United States Pediatric Leukemia Patients (1973–2006)

Abstract: Background. Age at diagnosis remains an important prognostic factor in pediatric leukemia. However, it is not fully understood which prognostic factors are related to its effect on survival. This study aimed to assess the effect of age at diagnosis on pediatric leukemia survival in the United States (US). Methods. We utilized the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data of the diagnosed pediatric leukemia patients (n = 15215) from . Life table, Kaplan-Meier, log rank test, and Cox proportional haz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Japan reported 5-year survival rate of 83% (Nakata et al, 2018) while South Korea recorded 5-year survival rate of 75.4% (Park et al, 2016) for this age group. We found huge differences in survival among age groups for childhood leukemia, with highest survival for children aged 1-4 years while lowest survival for adolescents aged 15-19, similar to a study in the United States which reported the age group 15-19 continued to show the lowest survival for longer time, while the age group 1-4 showed a persistent highest survival (Holmes et al, 2012). Improvements in childhood leukemia survival over time have been reported internationally and have been suggested to be most likely due to advances in treatment, standardization of treatment protocols and improvements in diagnosis of leukemia (Bonaventure et al, 2017) Among the childhood cancers, for children and adolescents aged 0-19, the highest 5-year survival rate was observed in malignant epithelial neoplasms (84.2%) while the lowest survival was for CNS tumours (44.1%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Japan reported 5-year survival rate of 83% (Nakata et al, 2018) while South Korea recorded 5-year survival rate of 75.4% (Park et al, 2016) for this age group. We found huge differences in survival among age groups for childhood leukemia, with highest survival for children aged 1-4 years while lowest survival for adolescents aged 15-19, similar to a study in the United States which reported the age group 15-19 continued to show the lowest survival for longer time, while the age group 1-4 showed a persistent highest survival (Holmes et al, 2012). Improvements in childhood leukemia survival over time have been reported internationally and have been suggested to be most likely due to advances in treatment, standardization of treatment protocols and improvements in diagnosis of leukemia (Bonaventure et al, 2017) Among the childhood cancers, for children and adolescents aged 0-19, the highest 5-year survival rate was observed in malignant epithelial neoplasms (84.2%) while the lowest survival was for CNS tumours (44.1%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, ALL patients in Syria have more frequently poor prognosis which could be due to other factors being involved in the period of the study such as the war. T-ALL is known for its poorer prognosis 12,19 . This all could explain the very high prevalence of high-risk ALL in Syria as these poor prognostic factors had a higher prevalence when comparing our study with other studies.…”
Section: Symptoms Fbc and Organomegaly Most Patients Presented Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was evident in the present study the relative predominance of male sex in the studied cases, a result which is similar to the gender distribution of childhood cancer in the United Kingdom over the years 2006-2008. [21] Reviewing a number of studies on gender distribution of childhood cancer from Singapore [30] , China [31] , United State of America [32] , Egypt [33] ,and Iran [34] , variation did exist in gender distribution of various types of childhood cancer. The variation with gender is a function of differential susceptibility, differential exposure to risk factors and variation in attributes related to study design, completeness of coverage of incident cases and others.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%