2023
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20031876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ageing and Keeping Pace with Technology: A Grounded Theory Study on Blind Adults’ Experiences of Adapting to New Technologies

Abstract: This study investigated blind adults’ experiences of adapting to digital technologies. The authors’ focus was on how they have been experiencing changes implied by digital transformation, which provided the starting point for assessing their prospects and/or limitations for self-development through new technologies in the future. The second point concerned designing technologies for blind adults by adding questions about their specific needs and expectations for digital device designers. To develop these main … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unique to our study was the finding that some participants experienced increasing financial flexibility in later life, which directly contrasts with previous research with older LGBTQ+ adults (Burton et al, 2019; Fredriksen-Goldsen et al, 2018) but is akin to findings from studies with cisgender and heterosexual older adults (Betlej, 2023). We note that financial security was reported more often by gay men, which aligns with previous studies (Carpenter & Eppink, 2017).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Unique to our study was the finding that some participants experienced increasing financial flexibility in later life, which directly contrasts with previous research with older LGBTQ+ adults (Burton et al, 2019; Fredriksen-Goldsen et al, 2018) but is akin to findings from studies with cisgender and heterosexual older adults (Betlej, 2023). We note that financial security was reported more often by gay men, which aligns with previous studies (Carpenter & Eppink, 2017).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%