2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00151-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agency costs, asset specificity, and the capital structure of the firm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Firm size is often taken as a measure of diversification and risk, while asset structure is a typical proxy for the cost if default occurs. Alderson and Betker (1995), Titman and Wessels (1988), and Vilasuso and Minkler (2001), among others, provide empirical evidence in support of the idea that firms which hold tangible assets can support more debt. Likewise in the context of Thailand, Wiwattanakantang (1999) finds support for the prediction that large firms are less prone to bankruptcy due to being more diversified.…”
Section: Capital Structure and Business Groups: Theoretical Consideramentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Firm size is often taken as a measure of diversification and risk, while asset structure is a typical proxy for the cost if default occurs. Alderson and Betker (1995), Titman and Wessels (1988), and Vilasuso and Minkler (2001), among others, provide empirical evidence in support of the idea that firms which hold tangible assets can support more debt. Likewise in the context of Thailand, Wiwattanakantang (1999) finds support for the prediction that large firms are less prone to bankruptcy due to being more diversified.…”
Section: Capital Structure and Business Groups: Theoretical Consideramentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Large firms have scale economies and better access to bank credits (see, for example, Chhibber and Majumdar, 1999) and size also affects governance. The asset structure or the asset tangibility influences corporate growth and valuation (see, for example, Vilasuso and Minkler, 2001), as well as managerial agency costs. For example, mortgage borrowing depends on the tangibility of assets.…”
Section: Impact Of Debt Financing On Managerial Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicate that the debt has a positive effect on free cash flow firms with low growth opportunities in terms of the bottom quartile of IOS. Vilasuso and Minkler (2001) develop a dynamic model that incorporates the issues of agency cost and asset specificity. Results based on an unbalanced panel of 28 publicly-held firms show that these two factors are significant determinants of the optimal capital structure of firms.…”
Section: Debt Policy and Agency Costs Of Free Cash Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%