Agency in Institutional Reform: Creating the Ethiopia Commodities Exchange

Abstract

Summary The role of agents and agency in institutional reform literature has largely been underplayed and decontextualized, even being described as a “black box.” Despite calls for linking individual agency with organizational and societal analysis, the specific contours of agency remain under‐theorized. This paper presents and illustrates a framework for institutional entrepreneurism, outlining the essential role and specific actions institutional entrepreneurs can contribute to introducing, promoting, and crystallizing institutional reforms. The framework identifies how institutional entrepreneurial actions shift in their targets and responses as the resource needs change in different stages of the reform process. Using the example of establishing the Ethiopia Commodities Exchange (ECX), I illustrate each stage of institutional entrepreneurial action. The ECX experience illustrates institutional entrepreneurs as networked, political actors, who announce institutional reforms through cultural efforts that make it as easy as possible for stakeholders to comply with proposed reforms. The who and the how of agency may shift through the stages of institutional reform. The ECX experience confirms that institutional reform is political and requires engaging with both macro‐level and micro‐level politics and power. The paper closes with implications for policy and practice. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The perils of a bureaucratic fad in Africa: Examining the effects of the agencification of the state apparatus in Gabon

“…In OECD countries, there is talk of the post-NPM agenda and the advent of the whole of the government approach to address the negative effects of NPM, such as bureaucratic coordination and control (Christensen & Laegreid, 2007;Verhoest, 2018, p. 331). In developing countries, which customarily have been "consumers" rather than "producers" of public sector reforms, the end of the Washington consensus has yet to be replaced by a dominant paradigm of intervention for international development agencies focused on global public management (see D. W. Brinkerhoff & Brinkerhoff, 2015;Crook, 2010;Levy, 2015;McCourt, 2008;Yanguas & Bukenya, 2016). While the paradigmatic search for public sector organization is still unfolding globally, many countries are attempting to reform their state apparatus either by following the waning NPM paradigm or emerging post-NPM intervention models.…”

“…Public sector reforms, usually borrowed from developed countries, have, however, proven inadequate for developing nations. Hence, many public sectors in the global "South" remain in crisis (see Brinkerhoff & Brinkerhoff, 2015). Consequently, various scholars have advocated moving away from the so-called best practices and toward new approaches that are more entrepreneurial and adaptive (Cummings, 2015), cognizant of factors such as political economy, domestic context, and institutions (Brinkerhoff, 2015;Levy, 2015;McCourt, 2008), and focused on "islands of effectiveness" rather than whole public sectors (Crook, 2010).…”

Towards a path-transformative heuristic in inclusive innovation initiatives: an exploratory case in rural communities in Colombia

“…Instead of that, we were attempting to disentangle from the IEs perspective, the processes that happen between the development phase and take-off phases explained by Rotmans and Kemp (2001). Thus, we are providing insights about the IEs' role in processes of institutional change (Brinkerhoff 2015) and how they open up transformative processes (Sotarauta and Pulkkinen 2011;Weik 2011;De Haan and Rotmans 2018).…”

Policy entrepreneurship across boundaries: a systematic literature review

“…The first implication is that raising awareness and support might also equally raise opposition to the policy entrepreneur’s proposal. As such, crossing boundaries might backfire on the entrepreneur, triggering effective counter-mobilisation, leading to stalemate, stability or delay instead of change (Diez 2010; Verger 2012; Brinkerhoff 2015; Budabin 2015; Orchard and Gillies 2015). Orchard and Gillies (2015) discuss the role of the US presidency in refugee protection in the early 20th century.…”