2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2005.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agent-based demand forecast in multi-echelon supply chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An agent is characterised by its ability to exploit significant amounts of domain knowledge, overcome erroneous input, use symbols and abstraction, learn from the decision environment, operate in real time and communicate with others in natural language (Newell 1989). Exploiting such characteristics, an agent-based system has often been employed to handle various SC issues including shop floor control (Van Dyke Parunak 1998, Shen et al 2000, Usher 2003, Wang and Shen 2003; logistics planning (Satapathy et al 1998); air traffic control (Iordanova 2003); aggregate demand planning and forecasting (Yu et al 2002, Liang andHuang 2006); joint production planning (Lima et al 2006); new product development (Liang and Huang 2002); order monitoring (Chen and Wei 2007); business-to-business negotiation Saleh 2000, Lenar andSobecki 2007); bidding evaluation (Kang and Han 2002); outsourcing relationship management (Logan 2000); customer relationship management (CRM) (Baxter et al 2003); SC relationship management (Ghiassi and Spera 2003); SC performance assessment (Gjerdrum et al 2001); SC coordination (Swaminathan 1998, Fox et al 2000, Nissen 2001, Sadeh et al 2001, Ono et al 2003, Chan and Chan 2004, Lou et al 2004, Xue et al 2005; SC collaboration under uncertainty (Kwon et al 2007); information exchange among SC partners (Garcia-Flores et al 2000, Turowski 2002); information tracking across the SC (Zimmermann et al 2001); material handling (Ito and Mousavi Jahan Abadi 2002); retail merchandise purchasing (Park and Park 2003); e-logistics (Santos et al 2003); strategic e-procurement (Cheung et al 2004...…”
Section: Agent-based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An agent is characterised by its ability to exploit significant amounts of domain knowledge, overcome erroneous input, use symbols and abstraction, learn from the decision environment, operate in real time and communicate with others in natural language (Newell 1989). Exploiting such characteristics, an agent-based system has often been employed to handle various SC issues including shop floor control (Van Dyke Parunak 1998, Shen et al 2000, Usher 2003, Wang and Shen 2003; logistics planning (Satapathy et al 1998); air traffic control (Iordanova 2003); aggregate demand planning and forecasting (Yu et al 2002, Liang andHuang 2006); joint production planning (Lima et al 2006); new product development (Liang and Huang 2002); order monitoring (Chen and Wei 2007); business-to-business negotiation Saleh 2000, Lenar andSobecki 2007); bidding evaluation (Kang and Han 2002); outsourcing relationship management (Logan 2000); customer relationship management (CRM) (Baxter et al 2003); SC relationship management (Ghiassi and Spera 2003); SC performance assessment (Gjerdrum et al 2001); SC coordination (Swaminathan 1998, Fox et al 2000, Nissen 2001, Sadeh et al 2001, Ono et al 2003, Chan and Chan 2004, Lou et al 2004, Xue et al 2005; SC collaboration under uncertainty (Kwon et al 2007); information exchange among SC partners (Garcia-Flores et al 2000, Turowski 2002); information tracking across the SC (Zimmermann et al 2001); material handling (Ito and Mousavi Jahan Abadi 2002); retail merchandise purchasing (Park and Park 2003); e-logistics (Santos et al 2003); strategic e-procurement (Cheung et al 2004...…”
Section: Agent-based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper proposes a variant of the Beer Game, which they called "Quebec Wood Supply Game". Liang and Huang (2006) developed, based on a multiagent architecture, a model which allowed predicting the order quantity in a supply chain with several nodes, where each one of them could use a different system of inventory. De la Fuente and Lozano (2007) presented an application of Distributed Intelligence to reduce the Bullwhip Effect in a supply chain, based on a genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Multiagent Systems In the Supply Chain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, ineffective communication affects material flows and creates long lead times. One of the great disadvantages of separated decision making in supply chain which is a result of also rational human behavior is bullwhip effect (Liang et al, 2005).…”
Section: Agent-based Supply Chain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%