2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11403-014-0132-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agent-based modeling and economic theory: where do we stand?

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue of aggregation has mostly been ignored in macroeconomics, mostly by assuming representative agents [97], but this has recently begun to change with the advent of ABM. In order to implement locality and search costs, bounded rationality and heterogeneity among consumers, the possibility for coordination failures [98], and defaults and network effects [99], ABMs have been proposed and especially applied in econophysics in order to explain distributions with fat tails and volatility clustering, thus enabling the analysis of emergent disequilibrium dynamics created by the interactions of heterogenous agents [100,101]. Some of these properties are directly linked to the way different time scales are incorporated in the models [102].…”
Section: Common Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of aggregation has mostly been ignored in macroeconomics, mostly by assuming representative agents [97], but this has recently begun to change with the advent of ABM. In order to implement locality and search costs, bounded rationality and heterogeneity among consumers, the possibility for coordination failures [98], and defaults and network effects [99], ABMs have been proposed and especially applied in econophysics in order to explain distributions with fat tails and volatility clustering, thus enabling the analysis of emergent disequilibrium dynamics created by the interactions of heterogenous agents [100,101]. Some of these properties are directly linked to the way different time scales are incorporated in the models [102].…”
Section: Common Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In designing economic applications, many complexity theorists work with agent-based models (ABMs) (e.g. Agar 2005;Ballot, Mandel, and Vignes 2014;Buchanan 2009;Cogliano and Jiang 2014;Farmer and Foley 2009;Li 2013). ABMs allow for the study of how macro-scale patterns develop from thousands or millions of interactions of heterogeneous micro-scale agents, instead of modeling the economy through a series of aggregate equations that may or may not be founded on micro data.…”
Section: The Ecology Metaphor In Abm Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in terms of the output, there are differences. For ABMs, there have been difficulties adapting model output to policy decisions, owing in no small part to the issue of calibration, or the ability to translate the numbers and patterns put out by the model into statistics that are analogous to observed statistics (Ballot, Mandel, and Vignes 2014). In contrast, DSGE models have been more successful at calibrating the models' output to numbers that can be translated into relevant units (for example, Euros), and orders, so that they more convincingly mimic observed statistics.…”
Section: Dsge and Segregation: From Equilibrium To Emergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ABM numerically simulate the actions and interactions of a finite number of autonomous agents. They can implement locality and search costs, bounded rationality and heterogeneity among consumers and firms, the possibility of coordination failures, defaults and network ef- fects (Ballot et al, 2014;Battiston et al, 2007;Feng et al, 2012). Usually, these approaches are based on discrete time frameworks and include a distinct sequence of events within each period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%