“…Next row will use the ascending decoding, namely, translation out as far as the user first, the direct view other users directly to its target for the unknown interference signal decoding, then translate the longest user minus from the superposition of quantity, decoding step by step, until recently the user is out without interference, and row, despite the use of mathematical deduction can prove that the upside scenario decoding order does not affect the overall system throughput, but usually adopts the ascending decoding, namely, first translate user recently, step by step out and eliminate, the final out as far as the user (14 to 15). - Different channel conditions are utilized at different power levels: compared with the previous OMA scheme, the channel conditions differences of each user are not utilized, or resources are not allocated according to different channel conditions of users. Similarly, in NOMA system with simple single antenna, the power distribution coefficient of each user, namely, the combination coefficient in the superposition code, is determined by the user's channel conditions: in superposition encoding, has a strong channel gain the user will be smaller share in the power of the distribution coefficient, the weaker the channel gain users will have greater power allocation coefficient, accounting for larger proportion of superposition, so that the recovery will not drown in target signal in strong user, thus effectively use different channel conditions by each user will be a win‐win way of distribution, can bring the system throughput significantly increased, and the channel between the two users gain the gap, the greater the NOMA system throughput than the OMA of ascension, the more obvious, It also further illustrates the advantages of utilizing the channel condition differences of each user 14–16
…”