2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-017-1112-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agent systems verification : systematic literature review and mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent systematic review about agent systems’ verification, Bakar and Selamat [ 3 ] analyzed 231 research works and concluded that only 25% of these approaches are suitable for run-time analysis. Model checking has been the main method for agents’ verification (142 works).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a recent systematic review about agent systems’ verification, Bakar and Selamat [ 3 ] analyzed 231 research works and concluded that only 25% of these approaches are suitable for run-time analysis. Model checking has been the main method for agents’ verification (142 works).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, how do we leverage information from an open MAS to provide citizens with intelligent services? MAS platforms and frameworks usually allow developers to analyze agents’ mental states and interactions among agents for testing, debugging, and verification purposes [ 3 ]. Regarding the study of agents’ mental states, these tools tend to assume that the agents’ implementation is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IoT performance studies (16) Privacy and trust studies (66) Security studies (199) Testing studies (111)…”
Section: Qa Studies (86)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solutions to managing quality or non-functional requirements, such as trust, reputation, and privacy, for agent systems were identified in a systematic literature review [10]. Trust and reputation management models, such as REGRET [11], A Fuzzy Reputation Agent System (AFRAS) [12], FIRE+ [13], Nusrat [14], and ScubAA [15], have previously been proposed.…”
Section: Quality Management In Agent Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%