Agglomerations and the rise of urban network externalities

Abstract

This paper introduces the theme of the special issue 'Agglomerations and the Rise of Urban Network Externalities'. Urban network externalities are defined as external economies from which firms and households can benefit by being located in agglomerations that are well embedded in networks that connect with other agglomerations. The contributions focus on the conceptualization of urban network externalities and their influence on urban performance. Finally, a research agenda is presented, that should focus on multiplexity and heterogeneity in networks and their impacts; interrelations between agglomerations and networks and their dynamic and place-based nature; and, the policy implications of urban network externalities.JEL classification: O18, R11, R12

Towards a New Conceptualization of Innovation in Space: Territorial Patterns of Innovation

“…The latter are the main sites of innovative activity, the ‘incubators’ of new knowledge: cities are the principal centres of research, given their large pools of expertise and the availability of advanced services (finance and insurance) that are ready to carry the risk of any innovative activity. The fuel for continuing knowledge and innovation processes in cities consists in the density of external, particularly international, linkages maintained and developed by individuals, groups, associations, firms and institutions––what is increasingly called ‘relational capital’ (Camagni, )––coupled with a large diversity of competencies, based on which complementary knowledge can find common cognitive ground (Burger and Meijers, ; Glaeser et al ., ).…”

Beyond Polycentricity: Does Stronger Integration Between Cities in Polycentric Urban Regions Improve Performance?

“…). This makes the strengthening of networks between such cities an alternative to further concentration in order to enhance the presence of agglomeration economies (although terms like ‘urban network externalities’ or ‘agglomeration externality fields’ would do more justice to their geography in that case; see Burger & Meijers ). Such clusters of historically and administratively distinct but proximate and well‐connected cities have been identified as ‘polycentric urban regions’ (PURs), among a variety of other, related designations, and have given rise to a substantial literature on the topic (see van Meeteren et al .…”

Secondary Yet Metropolitan? The Challenges of Metropolitan Integration for Second-Tier Cities

“…Alternative proposals explore the advantages of strong networks of cities in larger polycentric spaces (Batten, 1995;Van Oort, Burger, & Raspe, 2010), as well as the rise of 'agglomeration externality fields' . This is a shift from a nodal to a zonal conception of the spatial organisation of agglomeration benefits, now seen as a field of varying intensity covering large geographical areas where different places can mutually 'borrow size' but the costs of overconcentration are mitigated (Burger & Meijers, 2016;Phelps, Fallon, & Williams, 2001).…”