2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2192532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregate News Tone, Stock Returns, and Volatility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the findings do not support that media content is a proxy for new information on intrinsic asset values or market volatility, the authors found that news sentiment impacts market yield (Tetlock, 2011). The studies in Dougal et al (2012), Dzielinski and Hasseltoft (2013) and Boudoukh et al (2013) confirm that textual information could briefly predict returns at the aggregate market level/individual stock level. However, Jegadeesh and Wu (2013) found that predictions at an individual stock level are limited.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Though the findings do not support that media content is a proxy for new information on intrinsic asset values or market volatility, the authors found that news sentiment impacts market yield (Tetlock, 2011). The studies in Dougal et al (2012), Dzielinski and Hasseltoft (2013) and Boudoukh et al (2013) confirm that textual information could briefly predict returns at the aggregate market level/individual stock level. However, Jegadeesh and Wu (2013) found that predictions at an individual stock level are limited.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…While not surprising, it does provide confidence in the classification of negative and positive news articles. For equity returns, Dzielinski and Hasseltoft (2013) and Sinha (2016) find a similar relationship.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 67%
“…Following the Loughran dictionary, we included the constraining sentiment, litigious sentiment, and uncertain sentiment in this study. We also aggregated the affective sentiment by using the number of positive words minus the number of negative words in our analysis (Dzielinski and Hasseltoft, 2013;Xun and Guo, 2017), labeled as optimism sentiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%