2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45546-9_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregated Multicast with Inter-Group Tree Sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this procedure, multiple multicast groups are forced to share a single multicast distribution tree (MDT) a.k.a. aggregation tree (AT) [8][9][10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this procedure, multiple multicast groups are forced to share a single multicast distribution tree (MDT) a.k.a. aggregation tree (AT) [8][9][10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of aggregation was firstly studied in [8], further exploited by A. Fei et al for IP multicast routing with/without MPLS in [9][10][11], and it has been revisited in the specific context of MPLS VPNs in several works [7,12] where different aspects are addressed together with aggregation, including P2MP tree signaling and frame encapsulation mechanisms on the shared tree. In [10] the authors address many implementation aspects of group management and introduce a centralized management entity called tree manager, which is in charge of assigning groups to existing trees or create new ones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The trade-off is that this approach may waste extra bandwidth to deliver multicast data to non-group-member nodes. In our earlier work [8,9], we introduced the basic concept of aggregated multicast, proposed an algorithm to assign multicast groups to delivery trees with controllable bandwidth overhead and presented some initial results to show that multicast state can be reduced through inter-group tree sharing. However, a thorough performance evaluation of aggregated multicast is needed: what level of the gain does aggregated multicast offer over conventional multicast schemes?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%