2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregation and network formation of aqueous methylcellulose and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

25
170
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
25
170
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar effect was observed in other silicate systems, namely in aqueous solutions of lithium silicates [4] and sodiumtetramminezinc silicate [5]), as well as in several non-silicate organic systems. The latter include aqueous solutions of methylcellulose [6,7], of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose [6,8], of some block copolymers based on polyalkylene glycols, N-substituted polyacrylamides, polyphosphazenes, etc. [9,10].…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar effect was observed in other silicate systems, namely in aqueous solutions of lithium silicates [4] and sodiumtetramminezinc silicate [5]), as well as in several non-silicate organic systems. The latter include aqueous solutions of methylcellulose [6,7], of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose [6,8], of some block copolymers based on polyalkylene glycols, N-substituted polyacrylamides, polyphosphazenes, etc. [9,10].…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given semicrystalline polymer, such as cellulose, the chains are more in the regular, arrangement and it is rather difficult to unfold the well-packed chains into a disordered state in solution (Lindman et al 2010;Medronho and Lindman 2014). Over decades the hydrogen bonds network in cellulose has been claimed as the reason of the crystalline structure of cellulose and the limitations in cellulose dissolution (Bodvik et al 2010;Zhang et al 2002), while the amphiphilic nature of cellulose has probably been underestimated (Medronho et al 2012. Thus, when developing efficient solvents for cellulose dissolution, not only the intermolecular hydrogen bonds need to be overcome, but also the hydrophobic chain interactions have to be minimized (Glasser et al 2012;Medronho et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the development of moduli in aqueous MC is dramatically different to that in aqueous HPMC during the sol-gel transition. [29][30][31][32] For HPMC solutions, as temperature is raised, a sudden drop in the storage modulus is observed followed by an increase as gelation occurs. In contrast for MC solutions no sharp drop appears, the solutions merely thicken as temperature is increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%