2021
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2020.3019894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregation and Optimal Management of TCLs for Frequency and Voltage Control of a Microgrid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where (•) , • are defined as in (21). By collecting common factors, these can be written equivalently as…”
Section: Appendix A: Bslr Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where (•) , • are defined as in (21). By collecting common factors, these can be written equivalently as…”
Section: Appendix A: Bslr Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, [20] proposes a method to enable the maximum frequency response whilst respecting network constraints, although only MV level constraints are considered explicitly. Other works such as [21] consider a combined frequency response and voltage-regulation system for an MV microgrid, but only consider impacts of voltage in the secondary response. In [22], the authors develop an efficient, iterative method for distributed OPF in large distribution networks; similarly, in [23], the authors propose a framework for responding to TSO instructions, including automatic generation controls (AGC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed TCLbased PFC scheme in [16] could also cause unwanted frequency disturbances and destabilize the MG by delayed on/off switching of the TCLs. The authors of [18] have also proposed a centralized energy management scheme for the enabling the TCLs to participate in the PFC of an MG. Similar to [16], the proposed central scheme in [18] is not realistic and not applicable for low-inertia networks including islanded MGs since it is centralized and the authors have not considered the time delay of communication links.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [18] have also proposed a centralized energy management scheme for the enabling the TCLs to participate in the PFC of an MG. Similar to [16], the proposed central scheme in [18] is not realistic and not applicable for low-inertia networks including islanded MGs since it is centralized and the authors have not considered the time delay of communication links. In [19], the decentralized coordination of residential fridges is used to take part in the PFC of a large power system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation