1992
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(92)90238-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregation behavior of α,ω-type nonionic surfactant in aqueous solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figure shows that both at low and the high temperature the diffusion coefficient increases with increase in the copolymer concentrations, which suggests that the intermicellar interaction remains predominantly repulsive even near the cloud point. 70,71 The diffusion coefficient obtained near the cloud point are much lower than those obtained at 35 °C due to the growth of the micelles with increase in temperature. Because the reported stickiness parameters of the micelles are quite low at high copolymer concentrations (Figure 5), the large difference in the diffusion coefficient in that concentration range cannot be explained based on the adhesive hard-sphere model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The figure shows that both at low and the high temperature the diffusion coefficient increases with increase in the copolymer concentrations, which suggests that the intermicellar interaction remains predominantly repulsive even near the cloud point. 70,71 The diffusion coefficient obtained near the cloud point are much lower than those obtained at 35 °C due to the growth of the micelles with increase in temperature. Because the reported stickiness parameters of the micelles are quite low at high copolymer concentrations (Figure 5), the large difference in the diffusion coefficient in that concentration range cannot be explained based on the adhesive hard-sphere model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Surfactants are characterized by their hydrophilic head group, i.e., cationic (positively charged), anionic (negatively charged), zwitterionic (doubly charged, positive and negative), or nonionic (non-charged). Gemini, or dimeric surfactants, have two matching head groups connected by a linking chain, the most common being an alkylene chain; [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] the hydrophobic tails of the head groups may be the same (symmetric gemini surfactant) or different (asymmetric gemini surfactant). The symmetric members of the cationic gemini surfactants listed in the above references are the most commonly studied in the literature, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] whereas anionic, [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] zwitterionic, [32][33][34] and nonionic gemini [35][36][37] surfactants are comparatively less studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long chain ax alkanediols would face some difficulty in penetrating into the micellar interior and contribute to hydrophobic interaction. 1,6-Hexanediol and 1,8-octanediol tend to remain in the palisade layer, due to the long chain adopting a wicket-like folded structure much like the conformation adopted by bolaform surfactants [33,34]. These conformations require more space between two molecules of the micelle, which results in an increase in the hydrodynamic size of the MCP micelles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%