“…While STM is well suited for imaging single-crystal surfaces, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is better matched for imaging nanoscale catalyst particles (e.g., spherical nanoparticles, nanorods, and nanowires). The development of in situ holders for TEM in which gas and liquids can be introduced has enabled atomic-level visualization of the changes in nanoscale catalysts after reactive chemical species (e.g., H 2 , O 2 , or CO) are introduced into the cell. − In-situ holders designed for introducing gases are particularly useful for studying structural changes at elevated temperatures (e.g., 150 to 800 °C) during vapor-phase reactions such as methane oxidation, CO oxidation, − and other reactions. , In-situ liquid-cell holders with the ability to apply an electrical bias can be used to monitor morphological changes during electrochemical processes such as lithiation/delithiation, metal dendrite formation, − and, more recently, electrochemical reactions including water oxidation and oxygen reduction. , Changes in the surface structure of photocatalyst particles, such as titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ), under UV irradiation and in the presence of H 2 O have also been imaged. , While transmission electron microscopes can be coupled with instrumentation for detecting reaction products through mass spectrometry (MS) or electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), ,,− there is currently no way to correlate a specific region of the catalyst with the number of turnovers at that site nor how the observed structural changes affect its relative activity. So far, mapping the relative reactivity of different regions has been limited to reactions that produce gaseous products (e.g., water splitting to produce H 2 and O 2 gas) by imaging the formation of gas bubbles in liquid cells. ,, However, the gas bubbles are significantly larger (i.e., tens to hundreds of nanometers) than the reaction sites producing the bubbles.…”