1975
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1975.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregation of chlorambucil in vitro may cause misinterpretation of protein binding data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, such problems as anaphylactic reaction of tumor enhancement are only rarely mentioned. A problem in noncovalent linking of chlorambucil to antibody is the possible formation of aggregates of chlorambucil (Blakeslee et al 1975). The alkylating agent chlorambucil was physically linked to the antibodies according to the method described by Blakeslee & Kennedy (1974).…”
Section: Stability Of the Chlorambucil-antibody Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, such problems as anaphylactic reaction of tumor enhancement are only rarely mentioned. A problem in noncovalent linking of chlorambucil to antibody is the possible formation of aggregates of chlorambucil (Blakeslee et al 1975). The alkylating agent chlorambucil was physically linked to the antibodies according to the method described by Blakeslee & Kennedy (1974).…”
Section: Stability Of the Chlorambucil-antibody Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumulative energy of multiple ionic and other noncovalent bonds between two molecules has also been shown to produce very stable complexes (Szekerke et al 1972b. A problem in noncovalent linking of chlorambucil to antibody is the possible formation of aggregates of chlorambucil (Blakeslee et al 1975). The presence of these aggregates might lead to overestimation of the amount of active chlorambucil which is physically linked to the antibody.…”
Section: Stability Of the Chlorambucil-antibody Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have already described a method to adsorb chlorambucil to antitumour antibodies (Blakeslee & Kennedy,1974;Guclu et al, 1976), but in the previous applications of chlorambucilantibody conjugates, a certain percentage of the reported activity could have been due to the presence of a non-covalently bound aggregate of the drug (Blakeslee et al, 1975). The other method described for the covalent coupling of CBL (Tai et al, 1979) could lead to polymerisation of the carrier and needed a 2 h incubation in an aqueous solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%