2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-007-0088-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregation of classifiers based on image transformations in biometric face recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now, a large number of face recognition methods, such as appearance-based methods [1][2][3][4], Gabor wavelet methods [5][6][7]35,38], and machine learning-based methods [8,9], have been developed for still images. Zhao et al [10] provided a comprehensive survey of the studies of machine recognition of faces, categorized existing recognition techniques, and presented a detailed description of a number of representative methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, a large number of face recognition methods, such as appearance-based methods [1][2][3][4], Gabor wavelet methods [5][6][7]35,38], and machine learning-based methods [8,9], have been developed for still images. Zhao et al [10] provided a comprehensive survey of the studies of machine recognition of faces, categorized existing recognition techniques, and presented a detailed description of a number of representative methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kernel-PCA Schölkopf et al [13] have developed a nonlinear PCA called Kernel-PCA. The kernel-PCA is not interested in principal components in input space, but rather in principal components of variables which are nonlinearly related to the input variables [22]. They compute PCA in another dot product feature space F, which is related to the input space R MN by a possibly nonlinear map…”
Section: Color Space Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifiers based on the RBF neural networks are fused through the majority rule in [15]. In [19], majority voting and Bayesian product are used to aggregate chosen methods of dimensionality reduction. The work [28] at the decision level suggests the weighted sum rule for fusion of similarity matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%