2016
DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2015.2467051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AggreSet: Rich and Scalable Set Exploration using Visualizations of Element Aggregations

Abstract: Datasets commonly include multi-value (set-typed) attributes that describe set memberships over elements, such as genres per movie or courses taken per student. Set-typed attributes describe rich relations across elements, sets, and the set intersections. Increasing the number of sets results in a combinatorial growth of relations and creates scalability challenges. Exploratory tasks (e.g. selection, comparison) have commonly been designed in separation for set-typed attributes, which reduces interface consist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact has fostered a recent interest in the visualization community to advance visualization and processing techniques for engineering tensor fields [Carpendale, 2008]. Designing effective visualizations for engineering tensor fields is a multifaceted problem, which includes factors like visual intuitiveness [Franklin, 2015], scalability [Yalcin et al, 2016], interactivity [Boy et al, 2016], merging detail and context [Tax et al, 2015], integrating modeling and simulation [Nowke et al, 2015], and overcoming terminology barriers [Thielea et al, 2015], among many others. All this complexity usually results in trade-offs among different visualization strategies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact has fostered a recent interest in the visualization community to advance visualization and processing techniques for engineering tensor fields [Carpendale, 2008]. Designing effective visualizations for engineering tensor fields is a multifaceted problem, which includes factors like visual intuitiveness [Franklin, 2015], scalability [Yalcin et al, 2016], interactivity [Boy et al, 2016], merging detail and context [Tax et al, 2015], integrating modeling and simulation [Nowke et al, 2015], and overcoming terminology barriers [Thielea et al, 2015], among many others. All this complexity usually results in trade-offs among different visualization strategies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…settyped data). AggreSet [33] is another approach for set-typed data. It creates aggregations for set intersections, set pairs and set degrees, and represents the cardinality of each aggregation.…”
Section: # Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, existing approaches, including UpSet [4] and AggreSet [33], rely on aggregation (or grouping) rather than clustering: they provide predefined aggregations, such as "grouping intersections by degree", "grouping intersections by set" or "grouping intersections by pair of elements", or allows the user to create his own aggregates. Aggregation gives a more general view of the data.…”
Section: Intersection Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15,9] In particular, as regards variants such as Bubble Sets [11,29] and LineSets, [1] these techniques are unlike linear (and mosaic) diagrams, which display only abstract set relations, in that they "require the existence of embedded items", as pointed out by Rodgers et al [31] Similarly, this study does not compare mosaics to the many interactive set visualization systems proposed in the burgeoning literature on this topic. The reader is referred to these works and to the literature review below for comparisons of interactive systems in terms of their design features [42] and task taxonomies. [4] While empirical studies of interactive versions of mosaic (and indeed linear diagrams) are of great practical interest for future work, comparisons of this kind lie beyond our scope here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, aggregation-based techniques are more suitable for representing relationships between sets with large number of elements, where it would be impractical to show all the relationships between those elements. Examples of these techniques include AggreSet, [42] Radial Sets, [2] and PowerSets. [5] 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%