Aggression-guilt and conditionability for aggressiveness

Knott, Paul D.; Lasater, Lane; Shuman, Rich

doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1974.tb00678.x

Cited by 15 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, studies that looked at individual differences hypothesized to increase aggressive behavior but that yielded only one effect size were excluded from analyses. These included aggressionguilt (Knott, Lasater, & Shuman, 1974), authoritarianism (Altemeyer, 1981), dominance (Leyens, Herman, & Dunand, 1982), introversion (Garcia, 1985), locus of control (Dengerink, O'Leary, & Kasner, 1975), Machiavellianism (Murphy, 1974), and personal norm of reciprocity (Perugini & Gallucci, 2001). 6 Studies for which effect sizes could not be calculated included Bjork et al (2000); Pihl, Zacchia, and Zeichner (1982);and Stephens, Nelson, and Hudgens (1974).…”

Section: Variables Coded From Each Research Reportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review.

Bettencourt

Talley

Benjamin

et al. 2006

Psychological Bulletin

552

432

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors conducted a comprehensive review to understand the relation between personality and aggressive behavior, under provoking and nonprovoking conditions. The qualitative review revealed that some personality variables influenced aggressive behavior under both neutral and provocation conditions, whereas others influenced aggressive behavior only under provocation. Studies that assessed personality variables and that directly measured aggressive behavior were included in the quantitative review. Analyses revealed that trait aggressiveness and trait irritability influenced aggressive behavior under both provoking and neutral conditions but that other personality variables (e.g., trait anger, Type A personality, dissipation-rumination) influenced aggressive behavior only under provoking conditions. The authors discuss possible relations between these patterns of aggressive behavior and the personality dimensions of Agreeableness and Neuroticism and consider implications for theories of aggression.Keywords: aggressive behavior, personality traits, Agreeableness, NeuroticismWith a few notable exceptions (e.g., Freud, 1929Freud, /1962, early theorizing and research on aggressive behavior focused on the effects of situational factors (e.g., Bandura, 1973;Dollard, Doob, Miller, Mowrer, & Sears, 1939). Empirical studies and metaanalytic reviews have shown that the presence of violent cues (e.g.,

show abstract

Section: Variables Coded From Each Research Reportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review.

Bettencourt

Talley

Benjamin

et al. 2006

Psychological Bulletin

552

432

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As in the Husman (1955) study, boxers again scored higher on guilt than subjects in the comparison groups. As noted by Quanty (I976), subjects who experience high levels of guilt have been found to be less aggressive than others (Knott, Lasater, & Shuman, 1974) raising the possibility that the induction of guilt rather than a cathartic response may have produced the lower aggression.…”

Section: Player Aggression and Catharsismentioning

confidence: 91%

Sports Violence

1983

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PrefaceBooks about sports, even those written by scholars, are frequently little more than hagiography. They extol the virtue of athletics for participant and spectator alike. Of greater rarity are those that look critically at the political, social, economic, and psychological underpinnings of contemporary sports. Violence in sports is among the relatively neglected issues of serious study. Sports Violence is perhaps the first collection of scholarly theory and research to examine in detail aggression within and surrounding sports. As such, it seeks to present the broadest possible range of interpretations and perspectives. The book is, therefore, both interdisciplinary and international in scope.Two chapters, by Guttmann and Vamplew, are concerned with historical analyses of sports violence. Definitions and perspectives on aggression in general, and sports-related aggression in particular, are the topics of Chapters 4 through 7 by Smith, Bredemeier, Mark, Bryant, and Lehman, and Mummendey and Mummendey. Here, a wide variety of social and psychological theories are brought to bear on the conceptualization of aggression on the playing field and in the stands. Dunning and Liischen, both sociologists of sport, examine the origins, structure, and functions of violence, of sports, and of their interconnections. Psychological interpretations and research are presented in chapters by Russell and Keefer, Goldstein, and Kasiarz, while Bryant and Zillmann examine the portrayal and effects of aggression in televised sports.Just as sports violence is not confined to one inevitable perspective, it is not confined to one geographical location. Scholars from Europe, Australia, and North America have contributed to Sports Violence, and their discussions are not limited merely to the forms that violence in sports take in contemporary America. Included are accounts of sports aggression in ancient Rome, crowd disorders at British soccer and horse racing, player violence in soccer, and the relationship between Olympics participation and international conflict. vi Preface Sports Violence attempts to define, explore, and evaluate what we know about the origins, dynamics, and effects of sports-related aggression. It is intended to serve as a sourcebook for scholars interested in the current state of knowledge about the topic. Throughout the book are summaries and critical evaluations of relevant literature, original research, and suggestions for the direction of future theory and research. The book contains explicit suggestions and many implications for the reduction and control of aggression on and near the playing field. The book will prove useful, as well, to students of aggression and of physical education.Editing Sports Violence has been made all the more enjoyable and easy a task through the support and advice of Bob Kidd and the enthusiastic and professional staff at Springer-Verlag. Mary Hegeler and Bob Keefer ably assisted with the indexing.

show abstract

“…Solvent carbonising using perchloroethylene and hydrochloric acid [81,11>116] has been claimed to effect scouring and carbonising in a single process with minimal degradation of the wool fabric. Wool carbonised by this technique was dyed more uniformly than wool that had been carbonised by the conventional sulphuric acid method [113]. The process involved scouring and rinsing with perchloroethylene (40-60 s) followed by squeezing.…”

Section: Solvent Carbonisingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developments in wool carbonising

Pailthorpe¹

1991

Review of Progress in Coloration and Related Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aggression-guilt and conditionability for aggressiveness

Cited by 15 publications

References 14 publications

Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review.

Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review.

Sports Violence

Developments in wool carbonising

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About