Agile Human-Centered Software Engineering

Memmel, Thomas; Gundelsweiler, Fredrik; Reiterer, Harald

doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2007.17

Cited by 38 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Integration type (%) Key authors with related work None (14.7%) Constantine and Lockwood (2002), Hudson (2005), Sharp et al (2006), Ferreira et al (2007b), Patton (2007), , Federoff et al (2008), Bygstad et al (2008) and Slany (2009a, 2009b) Practices (23.5%) Ferre et al (2005aFerre et al ( , 2005b, Meszaros and Aston (2006), Chamberlain et al (2006), Anwar (2006), Parsons et al (2007), Memmel et al (2007aMemmel et al ( , 2007c, Detweiler (2007), Sy (2007), Wolkerstorfer et al (2008), Hussain et al (2008Hussain et al ( , 2009, Evnin and Pries (2008), Sy and Miller (2008), Obendorf and Finck (2008), Fox et al (2008), Ambler (2008), Adikari et al (2009), Miller and Sy (2009), Budwig et al (2009), Benigni et al (2010) and Sohaib and Khan (2010) Process (4.4%) Patton (2002aPatton ( , 2002b, Constantine (2002), Hansson (2002), Blomkvist (2005), Lee (2006Lee ( , 2010, Miller (2006), , Memmel et al (2007b), Haikara (2007), Duchting et ...…”

Section: Literature Review Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Software product innovation in agile usability teams: an analytical framework of social capital, network governance, and usability knowledge management

Barksdale

McCrickard

2012

IJAESD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As the practice of software engineering matures, project teams are leveraging the expertise of those with a background in other domains such as usability. This paper proposes a model and agenda for understanding and improving social interaction on agile usability software teams. We argue that social interaction on multidisciplinary agile usability teams, as a means to integrating the software development and usability domains, impacts how usability knowledge is managed, and thus, software product innovation. This work contributes: 1 a background, analysis, and discussion of the various agile usability integration strategies to-date 2 a model for investigating the social interaction in agile usability teams 3 a research, practice, and policy agenda for future work toward improving the social interaction in multidisciplinary agile usability software teams.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Software product innovation in agile usability teams: an analytical framework of social capital, network governance, and usability knowledge management

Barksdale

McCrickard

2012

IJAESD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, we found studies presenting process models for agile RE [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]. All these process models share the continuous management of requirements by involving stakeholder and user.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Memmel et al [10] develop a XP-based process model called Cross-discipline User Interface and Software Engineering (CRUISER). The process starts with an Initial Requirements Up-front Phase (IRUP) whose results are agile models that describe user needs by means of agile techniques (e.g.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Metamodel for Agile Requirements Engineering

Schön¹,

Sedeño²,

Mejías³

et al. 2019

JCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Value delivery is becoming an important asset for an organization due to increasing competition in industry. Therefore, companies apply Agile Software Development (ASD) to be more competitive and reduce time to market. Using ASD for the development of systems implies that established approaches of Requirements Engineering (RE) undergo some changes in order to be more flexible to changing requirements. To this end, the field of agile RE is emergent and different process models for agile RE have arisen. The aim of this paper is to build an abstract layer about the variety of existing process models by means of a metamodel for agile RE. It has been created in several iterations and relies on the evaluation of related process models. Furthermore, we have derived process models for agile RE in industry by presenting instances of the metamodel in two different cases: one is based on Scrum whereas the other is based on Kanban. This paper contributes to the software development body of knowledge by delivering a metamodel for agile RE that supports researchers and practitioners modeling and improving their own process models. We can conclude that the agile RE metamodel is highly relevant for the industry as well as for the research community, since we have derived it following empirical research in the field of ASD.

show abstract

“…The findings stated that the involvement of the right user not only helps in getting the right requirements done but also ensures the usability of the software. However, it is an issue to differentiate customers and real users in software development (Memmel et al, 2007). Memmel et al (2007) introduced a model called Cross-discipline User Interface design and Software Engineering (CRUISER) lifecycle, which combines HCI with SE.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Usability Evaluation Method for Agile Software Development

Butt¹,

Butt²

2015

ijsecs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agile methods are the best fit for tremendously growing software industry due to its flexible and dynamic nature. But the software developed using agile methods do meet the usability standards? To answer this question we can see that majority of agile software development projects currently involve interactive user interface designs, which can only be possible by following User Centered Design (UCD) in agile methods. The question here is, how to integrate UCD with agile models. Both Agile models and UCD are iterative in nature but agile models focus on coding and development of software; whereas, UCD focuses on user interface of the software. Similarly, both of them have testing features where the agile model involves automated tested code while UCD involves an expert or a user to test the user interface. In this paper, a new agile usability model is proposed and the evaluation is of the proposed model is presented by practically implementing it in three real life projects.. Key results from these projects clearly show: the proposed agile model incorporates usability evaluation methods, improves the relationship between usability experts to work with agile software experts; in addition, allows agile developers to incorporate the result from UCD into subsequent interactions.

show abstract

Agile Human-Centered Software Engineering

Cited by 38 publications

References 23 publications

Software product innovation in agile usability teams: an analytical framework of social capital, network governance, and usability knowledge management

Software product innovation in agile usability teams: an analytical framework of social capital, network governance, and usability knowledge management

A Metamodel for Agile Requirements Engineering

Usability Evaluation Method for Agile Software Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About